Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30740672›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2019

Bioengineering the microanatomy of human skin.

Mathilde Roger, Nicola Fullard, Lydia Costello, Steven Bradbury, Ewa Markiewicz, Steven O'Reilly, Nicole Darling, Pamela Ritchie, Arto Määttä, Iakowos Karakesisoglou and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Therapeutic Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Mathilde RogerDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Nicola FullardDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Lydia CostelloDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Steven BradburyDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Ewa MarkiewiczDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Steven O'ReillyDepartment of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK.
Nicole DarlingDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Pamela RitchieDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Arto MäättäDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Iakowos KarakesisoglouDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Glyn NelsonInstitute for Ageing and Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK.
Thomas von ZglinickiInstitute for Ageing and Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK.
Teresa DicolandreaMason Business Centre, Procter & Gamble, Mason, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Robert IsfortMason Business Centre, Procter & Gamble, Mason, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Charles BascomMason Business Centre, Procter & Gamble, Mason, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Stefan PrzyborskiDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7613-525X

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K019260/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011186/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S006710/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recreating the structure of human tissues in the laboratory is valuable for fundamental research, testing interventions, and reducing the use of animals. Critical to the use of such technology is the ability to produce tissue models that accurately reproduce the microanatomy of the native tissue. Current artificial cell-based skin systems lack thorough characterisation, are not representative of human skin, and can show variation. In this study, we have developed a novel full thickness model of human skin comprised of epidermal and dermal compartments. Using an inert porous scaffold, we created a dermal construct using human fibroblasts that secrete their own extracellular matrix proteins, which avoids the use of animal-derived materials. The dermal construct acts as a foundation upon which epidermal keratinocytes were seeded and differentiated into a stratified keratinised epithelium. In-depth morphological analyses of the model demonstrated very close similarities with native human skin. Extensive immunostaining and electron microscopy analysis revealed ultrastructural details such as keratohyalin granules and lamellar bodies within the stratum granulosum, specialised junctional complexes, and the presence of a basal lamina. These features reflect the functional characteristics and barrier properties of the skin equivalent. Robustness and reproducibility of in vitro models are important attributes in experimental practice, and we demonstrate the consistency of the skin construct between different users. In summary, a new model of full thickness human skin has been developed that possesses microanatomical features reminiscent of native tissue. This skin model platform will be of significant interest to scientists researching the structure and function of human skin.

Indexed as

SkinBasement MembraneCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedDermisEpidermisExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFibroblastsHumansIn Vitro TechniquesKeratinocytesMicroscopy, ElectronTissue EngineeringExtracellular Matrix Proteinsbarrier functiondermisepidermishumanmethodologyreproducibleskin equivalenttissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID30740672
PMCPMC6422806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.