Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30740472›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development2019

Utilization of HEPES for Enhancing Protein Transfection into Mammalian Cells.

Shun-Hua Chen, Angel Chao, Chia-Lung Tsai, Shih-Che Sue, Chiao-Yun Lin, Yi-Zong Lee, Yi-Lin Hung, An-Shine Chao, Ann-Joy Cheng, Hsin-Shih Wang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shun-Hua ChenGraduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Angel ChaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chia-Lung TsaiGenomic Medicine Research Core Laboratory, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Shih-Che SueInstitute of Bioinformatics and Structural Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Chiao-Yun LinGynecologic Cancer Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Yi-Zong LeeInstitute of Bioinformatics and Structural Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Yi-Lin HungInstitute of Bioinformatics and Structural Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
An-Shine ChaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ann-Joy ChengDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Laboratory Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Hsin-Shih WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Tzu-Hao WangGraduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWNational Tsing Hua University · TWChang Gung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The delivery of active proteins into cells (protein transfection) for biological purposes offers considerable potential for clinical applications. Herein we demonstrate that, with a readily available, inexpensive organic agent, the 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) method can be used for simple and efficient protein transfection. By mixing proteins with a pure HEPES solution before they are applied to live cells, proteins with various molecular weights (including antibodies, recombinant proteins, and peptides) were successfully delivered into the cytoplasm of different cell types. The protein transfection efficiency of the HEPES method was not inferior to that of commercially available systems that are both more expensive and time consuming. Studies using endocytotic inhibitors and endosomal markers have revealed that cells internalize HEPES-protein mixtures through endocytosis. Results that HEPES-protein mixtures exhibited a low diffusion coefficient suggest that HEPES might neutralize the charges of proteins and, thus, facilitate their cellular internalization. Upon internalization, the cytosolic antibodies caused the degradation of targeted proteins in TRIM21-expressing cells. In summary, the HEPES method is efficient for protein transfection and has potential for myriad clinical applications.

Indexed as

HEPESintracellularly targetingprotein transfection

Identifiers

PMID30740472
PMCPMC6357789
OpenAlexW2905905427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.