Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30740410›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2018

The middle-term result of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Chinese obesity patients in a single hospital, with the review of literatures and strategy for gastric stenosis.

Jianzhong Di, Chen Wang, Pin Zhang, Xiaodong Han, Weijie Liu, Hongwei Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiome and visceral fat accumulation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jianzhong DiDepartment of General Surgery, the Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200233, China.
Chen WangDepartment of General Surgery, the Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200233, China.
Pin ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, the Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200233, China.
Xiaodong HanDepartment of General Surgery, the Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200233, China.
Weijie LiuDepartment of General Surgery, the Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200233, China.
Hongwei ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, the Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200233, China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai Sixth People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the medium-term metabolic results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in Chinese patients.

methodsWe performed a retrospective study of our LSG results between February 2011 and February 2015, and conducted a literature review of stenosis after LSG during a recent 10-year period.

resultsOf 142 patients in our study, the mean initial body mass index (BMI) was 38.34 kg/m

conclusionsLSG is a relatively safe surgical option for weight loss as a primary procedure in our study. Stenosis after LSG requires diagnosis and treatment promptly. Surgery can be a feasible treatment option, but care must be taken to avoid complications.

Indexed as

obesitySleeve gastrectomystenosisstricturetype 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)

Identifiers

PMID30740410
PMCPMC6331356
OpenAlexW2904775819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.