Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30740388›Full record

ArticleQuantitative bio-science2017

A Selective Review on Random Survival Forests for High Dimensional Data.

Hong Wang, Gang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative bio-science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hong WangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Central South University, Hunan 410083, China.
Gang LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Biomathematics, School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

Funding

Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JOHN A GLASPY · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
UCLA Center for Excellence in Pancreatic DiseasesP01AT003960 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GO, VAY LIANG W · 2007 to 2011
$5.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCCIH NIH HHS P01 AT003960NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decades, there has been considerable interest in applying statistical machine learning methods in survival analysis. Ensemble based approaches, especially random survival forests, have been developed in a variety of contexts due to their high precision and non-parametric nature. This article aims to provide a timely review on recent developments and applications of random survival forests for time-to-event data with high dimensional covariates. This selective review begins with an introduction to the random survival forest framework, followed by a survey of recent developments on splitting criteria, variable selection, and other advanced topics of random survival forests for time-to-event data in high dimensional settings. We also discuss potential research directions for future research.

Indexed as

CensoringRandom survival forestSurvival ensembleSurvival treeTime-to-event data

Identifiers

PMID30740388
PMCPMC6364686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.