Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30740313›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2019

Adapting an internet-delivered intervention for depression for a Colombian college student population: An illustration of an integrative empirical approach.

Alicia Salamanca-Sanabria, Derek Richards, Ladislav Timulak

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05746767 (SUPERA), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05746767 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

SUPERA: Supporting Peer Interactions to Expand Access to Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Spanish-speaking Safety-Net Patients in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, IrvineRan2024 to 2028Enrolled426ConditionsDepression, AnxietyArmsSupported dCBT, Unsupported dCBT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. CanCOGHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alicia Salamanca-SanabriaE-mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Derek RichardsE-mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Ladislav TimulakE-mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCulturally adapted psychotherapy (CAP) studies are limited and until now there are few published examples that illustrate the process of cultural adaptation with internet-delivered treatments.

aimThis paper aims to illustrate an integrative approach to the cultural adaptation of an evidence-based internet-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy intervention for depression (

methodMixed method approach utilising quantitative and qualitative methods to assist in the cultural adaptation of the

resultsThe adaptation included an establishment of CSF, which included the incorporation of Colombian cultural expressions. College students' (

conclusionsThe research provided support for the idea that CAP can be conducted systematically for internet-delivered interventions.

Indexed as

Cultural equivalenceCulturally adapted psychotherapyCultural sensitivity frameworkDepressionEcological validity frameworkInternet-delivered treatment

Identifiers

PMID30740313
PMCPMC6356089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.