Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30740267›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2019

Portable Perimetry Using Eye-Tracking on a Tablet Computer-A Feasibility Assessment.

Pete R Jones, Nicholas D Smith, Wei Bi, David P Crabb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Home monitoring devices for glaucoma.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Tablet-based multi-stimulus perimetry for glaucoma screening.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Usefulness of a simplified self-checking tool (Quattro Checker®) for visual field defects in glaucoma patients.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The importance of assessing vision in falls management: A narrative review.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Eye Tracking in Optometry: A Systematic Review.Journal of eye movement research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pete R JonesDivision of Optometry and Visual Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
Nicholas D SmithDivision of Optometry and Visual Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
Wei BiDivision of Optometry and Visual Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
David P CrabbDivision of Optometry and Visual Science, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVisual field (VF) examination by standard automated perimetry (SAP) is an important method of clinical assessment. However, the complexity of the test, and its use of bulky, expensive equipment makes it impractical for case-finding. We propose and evaluate a new approach to paracentral VF assessment that combines an inexpensive eye-tracker with a portable tablet computer ("Eyecatcher").

methodsTwenty-four eyes from 12 glaucoma patients, and 12 eyes from six age-similar controls were examined. Participants were tested monocularly (once per eye), with both the novel Eyecatcher test and traditional SAP (HFA SITA standard 24-2). For Eyecatcher, the participant's task was to simply to look at a sequence of fixed-luminance dots, presented relative to the current point of fixation. Start and end fixations were used to determine locations where stimuli were seen/unseen, and to build a continuous map of sensitivity loss across a VF of approximately 20°.

resultsEyecatcher was able to clearly separate patients from controls, and the results were consistent with those from traditional SAP. In particular, mean Eyecatcher scores were strongly correlated with mean deviation scores (

conclusionsPortable perimetry using an inexpensive eye-tracker and a tablet computer is feasible, although possible means of improvement are suggested. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Such a test could have significant utility as a case finding device.

Indexed as

eye-movementsglaucomastatic perimetryvisual fields

Identifiers

PMID30740267
PMCPMC6364754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.