ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2019
3D-printed bioactive scaffolds from nanosilicates and PEOT/PBT for bone tissue engineering.
Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in bioactivity: inducing and detecting mineralization of regenerative polymeric scaffolds.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2024Review
- Poly(l-lactic acid)-based double-layer composite scaffold for bone tissue repair.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Article
- A bilayer bioengineered patch with sequential dual-growth factor release to promote vascularization in bladder reconstruction.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Article
- Animal models in medical translation: the grand challenge of developing new treatments for human diseases.Frontiers in medical technology · 2024Article
- Multi-leveled Nanosilicate Implants Can Facilitate Near-Perfect Bone Healing.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023Article
- Electrospinning Inorganic Nanomaterials to Fabricate Bionanocomposites for Soft and Hard Tissue Repair.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- From 3D printing to 3D bioprinting: the material properties of polymeric material and its derived bioink for achieving tissue specific architectures.Cell and tissue banking · 2022Review
- Two-dimensional nanomaterials-added dynamism in 3D printing and bioprinting of biomedical platforms: Unique opportunities and challenges.Biomaterials · 2022Review
- A Modular Composite Device of Poly(Ethylene Oxide)/Poly(Butylene Terephthalate) (PEOT/PBT) Nanofibers and Gelatin as a Dual Drug Delivery System for Local Therapy of Soft Tissue Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Implication of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Derivates for Osteochondral Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Integrating pore architectures to evaluate vascularization efficacy in silicate-based bioceramic scaffolds.Regenerative biomaterials · 2022Article
- Advances in Use of Nanomaterials for Musculoskeletal Regeneration.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- 3D additive manufactured composite scaffolds with antibiotic-loaded lamellar fillers for bone infection prevention and tissue regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2021Article
- 3D Printing of Micro- and Nanoscale Bone Substitutes: A Review on Technical and Translational Perspectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2021Review
- The Overview of Porous, Bioactive Scaffolds as Instructive Biomaterials for Tissue Regeneration and Their Clinical Translation.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
- Additive manufactured, highly resilient, elastic, and biodegradable poly(ester)urethane scaffolds with chondroinductive properties for cartilage tissue engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2020Article
- Bioprinting 101: Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of Cell-Laden 3D Bioprinted Scaffolds.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2020Article
- 2D Nanoclay for Biomedical Applications: Regenerative Medicine, Therapeutic Delivery, and Additive Manufacturing.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) has shown promise in designing 3D scaffold for regenerative medicine. However, many synthetic biomaterials used for AM are bioinert. Here, we report synthesis of bioactive nanocomposites from a poly(ethylene oxide terephthalate) (PEOT)/poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) (PEOT/PBT) copolymer and 2D nanosilicates for fabricating 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. PEOT/PBT have been shown to support calcification and bone bonding ability
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.