ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2019
Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hyaluronan-Containing Injectable Magnesium-Calcium Phosphate Cements Demonstrated Improved Performance, Cytocompatibility, and Ability to Support Osteogenic Differentiation In Vitro.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Biodegradable Zn-5Dy Alloy with Enhanced Osteo/Angio-Genic Activity and Osteointegration Effect via Regulation of SIRT4-Dependent Mitochondrial Function.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Enhancing Bone Cement Efficacy with Hydrogel Beads Synthesized by Droplet Microfluidics.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Bone Cements Used in Vertebral Augmentation: A State-of-the-art Narrative Review.Journal of pain research · 2024Review
- Advances in materials used for minimally invasive treatment of vertebral compression fractures.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Article
- Sudoku of porous, injectable calcium phosphate cements - Path to osteoinductivity.Bioactive materials · 2022Review
- CaCOFrontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
- Proteomics reveals differential adsorption of angiogenic platelet lysate proteins on calcium phosphate bone substitute materials.Regenerative biomaterials · 2022Article
- The osteogenesis effect of rhBMP2-loaded calcium phosphate cements in repairing dental extraction sockets.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Influence of Natural Polysaccharides on Properties of the Biomicroconcrete-Type Bioceramics.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Effect of Gold Nanoparticles and Silicon on the Bioactivity and Antibacterial Properties of Hydroxyapatite/Chitosan/Tricalcium Phosphate-Based Biomicroconcretes.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Repair calvarial defect of osteoporotic rats by berberine functionalized porous calcium phosphate scaffold.Regenerative biomaterials · 2021Article
- Strontium ranelate incorporated 3D porous sulfonated PEEK simulating MC3T3-E1 cell differentiation.Regenerative biomaterials · 2021Article
- Application of biomaterials for the repair and treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.Regenerative biomaterials · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calcium phosphate cements (CPCs) have been widely used as bone graft substitutes for many years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of two novel injectable, bioactive cements: β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP)/CPC and chitosan microsphere/CPC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.