Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30740233›Full record

ArticleBMJ open gastroenterology2019

Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Hassan Tariq, Muhammad Umar Kamal, Binita Sapkota, Fady ElShikh, Usman Ali Pirzada, Nanda Pullela, Sara Azam, Aiyi Zhang, Ahmed Baiomi, Hafsa Abbas and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Hassan TariqDepartment of Medicine, BronxCare Health System, New York City, New York, USA.
Muhammad Umar KamalDepartment of Medicine, BronxCare Health System, New York City, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4323-3440
Binita SapkotaDepartment of Medicine, BronxCare Health System, New York City, New York, USA.
Fady ElShikhDepartment of Medicine, BronxCare Health System, New York City, New York, USA.
Usman Ali PirzadaDepartment of Medicine, BronxCare Health System, New York City, New York, USA.
Nanda PullelaDepartment of Medicine, BronxCare Health System, New York City, New York, USA.
Sara AzamDepartment of Medicine, BronxCare Health System, New York City, New York, USA.
Aiyi ZhangDepartment of Medicine, BronxCare Health System, New York City, New York, USA.
Ahmed BaiomiDepartment of Medicine, BronxCare Health System, New York City, New York, USA.
Hafsa AbbasDepartment of Medicine, BronxCare Health System, New York City, New York, USA.
Jasbir MakkerDepartment of Medicine, BronxCare Health System, New York City, New York, USA.
Bhavna BalarDepartment of Medicine, BronxCare Health System, New York City, New York, USA.
Ariyo IhimoyanDepartment of Medicine, BronxCare Health System, New York City, New York, USA.
Myrta DanielDepartment of Medicine, BronxCare Health System, New York City, New York, USA.
Anil DevDepartment of Medicine, BronxCare Health System, New York City, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColonoscopy is a commonly used modality for screening and surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, it is essential to have adequate bowel preparation (prep) for the procedure which depends on type of bowel regimens, diet before colonoscopy and timing of the procedure.

aimsThe purpose of this study is to analyse the effect of multiple factors on adenoma detection rate (ADR) and prep quality of colonoscopy. This is the also the first study determining outcomes based on various combinations of diet, timing of the procedure and bowel prep regimens.

methodsThis is a retrospective single-centre observational study. Data about diet before procedure, bowel prepprep regimen and timing of the procedure was collected for patients coming for screening colonoscopy.

resultsPatients with split prep had higher good prep rates (73.8% vs 56.2%) and higher ADRs (34.2 % vs 29.9%) as compared with non-split prep. The good prep quality (65.8% vs 62.1%) and ADRs (31.9% vs 31.5%) were comparable in patients who received clear liquid diet as compared with low residue diet. The good results of bowel prep were obtained with split prep with either clear liquids or low residue diet irrespective of the timing of procedure. The poor prep was noticed in patients who underwent procedure in afternoon, with a low restrictive diet and non-split bowel regimen.

conclusionsThe current study adds to our knowledge about the combined effect of multiple variables affecting the bowel prep quality and ADR. It is imperative to opt for the best combination required for colonoscopy, as this will influence the effectiveness of colonoscopies regarding timely cancer detection and prevention.

Indexed as

colonic adenomascolonoscopycolorectal cancercolorectal cancer screeningdiet

Identifiers

PMID30740233
PMCPMC6347943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.