ArticleProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action2018
Lessons Learned from the Implementation of a Shared Community-Academic HIV Prevention Intervention.
Article in Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combating Chronic Disease with Barbershop Health Interventions: A Review of Current Knowledge and Potential for Big Data.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2024Review
- A scoping review to identify and describe the characteristics of theories, models and frameworks of health research partnerships.Health research policy and systems · 2022Article
- HIV Testing Correlates: U.S. and Foreign Born High-Risk Black Heterosexual Men.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2021Article
- Development of a Community Advisory Board to Guide Research About Cancer Disparities in the Black and African American Community.Nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCommunity-based participatory research (CBPR) is used to guide the design and evaluation of programs aimed at addressing complex health issues. Effective administrative management of CBPR projects is essential to ensuring the success and fidelity of these programs.
objectiveWe identify an administrative framework to support the implementation and management of a community- academic CBPR initiative.
methodsThe Barbershop Talk with Brothers (BTWB) project was a cluster randomized CBPR intervention designed to reduce HIV among high-risk heterosexual men. Eight-hundred sixty men, representing 53 barbershops, participated in the project.
resultsThe 3Ps framework is defined by 1) partnership, 2) product, and 3) process. We describe the implementation of the 3Ps through applied examples including partnership management strategies, planning of shared resources, and flexible budgeting that can support the unique infrastructure of a shared community-academic project.
conclusionsThe 3Ps are a translatable framework for comparable shared community-academic research projects to adopt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.