Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30739743›Full record

SynthesisLancet (London, England)2019

Increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy by more frequent administration or sequential scheduling: a patient-level meta-analysis of 37 298 women with early breast cancer in 26 randomised trials.

Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG)

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lancet (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 191 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
191citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00798070 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Randomised Phase 3 Study Comparing Biweekly and Tailored Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed by Biweekly Tailored Docetaxel Versus Three Weekly Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide + 5-fluorouracil Followed by Docetaxel in Lymph Node Positive or High Risk Lymph Node Negative Breast Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska University HospitalRan2007 to 2028Enrolled2,017ConditionsBreast CancerArmsdtEC→dtT, FEC→T
NCT06190600 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Supervised Physical Activity in Young Women With Early Breast Cancer During Neoadjuvant Chemotherpy

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Greater Poland Cancer CentreRan2018 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsBreast CancerArmsHigh Intensity Interval Training (HIIT), neoadjuvant treatment (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, trastuzumab, pertuzumab), Standard Supportive Care
NCT07521397 completednot on this map

Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data of Patients With Early-stage Breast Cancer Treated With Adjuvant Dose-dense Sequential Chemotherapy (Ddsc): a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) Study

TypeobservationalSponsorHellenic Cooperative Oncology GroupRan1996 to 2022Enrolled5,358ConditionsBreast Cancer, Early Stage Breast Cancer, Adjuvant Chemotherapy, Prognosis Breast Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

191 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 385 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. SEOM-GEICAM-SOLTI clinical guidelines for early-stage breast cancer (UPDATE 2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Adjuvant Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Tailored Dose-Dense Versus Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: End-of-Study Results of the Randomized PANTHER Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  20. Adjuvant Capecitabine for Early Breast Cancer: 15-Year Overall Survival Results From a Randomized Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Trial

131 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG)

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
Cancer Research UK 21133Cancer Research UK 25351Cancer Research UK 27691Medical Research Council MC_U137686850Medical Research Council MC_U137686858Medical Research Council MC_UU_12026/1NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing the dose intensity of cytotoxic therapy by shortening the intervals between cycles, or by giving individual drugs sequentially at full dose rather than in lower-dose concurrent treatment schedules, might enhance efficacy.

methodsTo clarify the relative benefits and risks of dose-intense and standard-schedule chemotherapy in early breast cancer, we did an individual patient-level meta-analysis of trials comparing 2-weekly versus standard 3-weekly schedules, and of trials comparing sequential versus concurrent administration of anthracycline and taxane chemotherapy. The primary outcomes were recurrence and breast cancer mortality. Standard intention-to-treat log-rank analyses, stratified by age, nodal status, and trial, yielded dose-intense versus standard-schedule first-event rate ratios (RRs).

findingsIndividual patient data were provided for 26 of 33 relevant trials identified, comprising 37 298 (93%) of 40 070 women randomised. Most women were aged younger than 70 years and had node-positive disease. Total cytotoxic drug usage was broadly comparable in the two treatment arms; colony-stimulating factor was generally used in the more dose-intense arm. Combining data from all 26 trials, fewer breast cancer recurrences were seen with dose-intense than with standard-schedule chemotherapy (10-year recurrence risk 28·0% vs 31·4%; RR 0·86, 95% CI 0·82-0·89; p<0·0001). 10-year breast cancer mortality was similarly reduced (18·9% vs 21·3%; RR 0·87, 95% CI 0·83-0·92; p<0·0001), as was all-cause mortality (22·1% vs 24·8%; RR 0·87, 95% CI 0·83-0·91; p<0·0001). Death without recurrence was, if anything, lower with dose-intense than with standard-schedule chemotherapy (10-year risk 4·1% vs 4·6%; RR 0·88, 95% CI 0·78-0·99; p=0·034). Recurrence reductions were similar in the seven trials (n=10 004) that compared 2-weekly chemotherapy with the same chemotherapy given 3-weekly (10-year risk 24·0% vs 28·3%; RR 0·83, 95% CI 0·76-0·91; p<0·0001), in the six trials (n=11 028) of sequential versus concurrent anthracycline plus taxane chemotherapy (28·1% vs 31·3%; RR 0·87, 95% CI 0·80-0·94; p=0·0006), and in the six trials (n=6532) testing both shorter intervals and sequential administration (30·4% vs 35·0%; RR 0·82, 95% CI 0·74-0·90; p<0·0001). The proportional reductions in recurrence with dose-intense chemotherapy were similar and highly significant (p<0·0001) in oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative disease and did not differ significantly by other patient or tumour characteristics.

interpretationIncreasing the dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy by shortening the interval between treatment cycles, or by giving individual drugs sequentially rather than giving the same drugs concurrently, moderately reduces the 10-year risk of recurrence and death from breast cancer without increasing mortality from other causes.

fundingCancer Research UK, Medical Research Council.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID30739743
PMCPMC6451189
OpenAlexW2913286462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.