Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30739539›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2019

Varying but reduced use of postoperative mobilization restrictions after primary total hip arthroplasty in Nordic countries: a questionnaire-based study.

Kirill Gromov, Anders Troelsen, Maziar Modaddes, Ola Rolfson, Ove Furnes, Geir Hallan, Antti Eskelinen, Perttu Neuvonen, Henrik Husted

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kirill Gromova Department of Orthopaedic Surgery , Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre , Denmark.
Anders Troelsena Department of Orthopaedic Surgery , Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre , Denmark.
Maziar Modaddesc Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy , University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden.
Ola Rolfsonc Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy , University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden.
Ove Furnese The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery , Haukeland University Hospital , Bergen , Norway.
Geir Hallane The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery , Haukeland University Hospital , Bergen , Norway.
Antti Eskelineng Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, and Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences , University of Tampere , Tampere , Finland.
Perttu Neuvoneng Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, and Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences , University of Tampere , Tampere , Finland.
Henrik Husteda Department of Orthopaedic Surgery , Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre , Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose - Mobilization has traditionally been restricted following total hip arthroplasty (THA) in an attempt to reduce the risk of dislocation and muscle detachment. However, recent studies have questioned the effect and rationale underlying such restrictions. We investigated the use of postoperative restrictions and possible differences in mobilization protocols following primary THA in Denmark (DK), Finland (FIN), Norway (NO), and Sweden (SWE). Patients and methods - All hospitals performing primary THA in the participating countries were identified from the latest national THA registry report. A questionnaire containing questions regarding standard surgical procedure, use of restrictions, and postoperative mobilization protocol was distributed to all hospitals through national representatives for each arthroplasty registry. Results - 83% to 94% (n = 167) of the 199 hospitals performing THA in DK, FIN, NO, and SWE returned correctly filled out questionnaires. A posterolateral approach was used by 77% of the hospitals. 92% of the hospitals had a standardized mobilization protocol. 50%, 41%, 19%, and 38% of the hospitals in DK, FIN, NO, and SWE, respectively, did not have any postoperative restrictions. If utilized, restrictions were applied for a median of 6 weeks. Two-thirds of all hospitals have changed their mobilization protocol within the last 5 years-all but 2 to a less restrictive protocol. Interpretation - Use of postoperative restrictions following primary THA differs between the Nordic countries, with 19% to 50% allowing mobilization without any restrictions. There has been a strong tendency towards less restrictive mobilization over the last 5 years.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipEarly AmbulationHip DislocationPostoperative ComplicationsAgedFemaleHip ProsthesisHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodRecovery of FunctionRegistriesScandinavian and Nordic CountriesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30739539
PMCPMC6461082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.