Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30739382›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2019

Adaptation of the Mullen Scales of Early Learning for use among infants aged 5- to 24-months in rural Gambia.

Bosiljka Milosavljevic, Perijne Vellekoop, Helen Maris, Drew Halliday, Saikou Drammeh, Lamin Sanyang, Momodou K Darboe, Clare Elwell, Sophie E Moore, Sarah Lloyd-Fox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Children Following In Utero Exposure to Zika in Nicaragua.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Contextual Approach to Characterizing Caregiver Responsiveness in a Rural Area of The Gambia.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bosiljka MilosavljevicCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9590-0869
Perijne VellekoopThe Global Health and Tropical Medicine Training Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Helen MarisCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
Drew HallidayDepartment of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Saikou DrammehMedical Research Council, The Gambia, at The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lamin SanyangMedical Research Council, The Gambia, at The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Momodou K DarboeMedical Research Council, The Gambia, at The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Clare ElwellDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Sophie E MooreDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Sarah Lloyd-FoxCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0300025Medical Research Council G0400120Medical Research Council G0701458Medical Research Council MC_U123292701Medical Research Council MC_UP_1005/1Medical Research Council MR/P012019/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infants in low-resource settings are at heightened risk for compromised cognitive development due to a multitude of environmental insults in their surroundings. However, the onset of adverse outcomes and trajectory of cognitive development in these settings is not well understood. The aims of the present study were to adapt the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) for use with infants in a rural area of The Gambia, to examine cognitive development in the first 24-months of life and to assess the association between cognitive performance and physical growth. In Phase 1 of this study, the adapted MSEL was tested on 52 infants aged 9- to 24-months (some of whom were tested longitudinally at two time points). Further optimization and training were undertaken and Phase 2 of the study was conducted, where the original measures were administered to 119 newly recruited infants aged 5- to 24-months. Infant length, weight and head circumference were measured concurrently in both phases. Participants from both phases were split into age categories of 5-9 m (N = 32), 10-14 m (N = 92), 15-19 m (N = 53) and 20-24 m (N = 43) and performance was compared across age groups. From the ages of 10-14 m, Gambian infants obtained lower MSEL scores than US norms. Performance decreased with age and was lowest in the 20-24 m old group. Differential onsets of reduced performance were observed in the individual MSEL domains, with declines in visual perception and motor performance detected as early as at 10-14 months, while reduced language scores became evident after 15-19 months of age. Performance on the MSEL was significantly associated with measures of growth.

Indexed as

CognitionBody SizeChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolFemaleGambiaHumansInfantLanguageLearningMalePsychomotor PerformanceVisual Perceptioncognitive developmentglobal mental healthgrowthinfancyMullen Scales of Early LearningThe Gambia

Identifiers

PMID30739382
PMCPMC6767903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.