Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30739308›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in behavioral neurosciences2019

Prefrontal Contributions to Attention and Working Memory.

Zahra Bahmani, Kelsey Clark, Yaser Merrikhi, Adrienne Mueller, Warren Pettine, M Isabel Vanegas, Tirin Moore, Behrad Noudoost

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical and intracranial electrophysiological signatures of post-operative and post-ictal delirium.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Timescales of learning in prefrontal cortex.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zahra BahmaniSchool of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran.
Kelsey ClarkDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Yaser MerrikhiDepartment of Physiology & Pharmacology, The Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Adrienne MuellerDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Warren PettineCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
M Isabel VanegasDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Tirin MooreDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Behrad NoudoostDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. behrad.noudoost@utah.edu.

Funding

Understanding the prefrontal mechanisms involved in the enhancement and maintenance of visual signals.R01EY026924 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NOUDOOST, BEHRAD · 2016 to 2025
$3.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The processes of attention and working memory are conspicuously interlinked, suggesting that they may involve overlapping neural mechanisms. Working memory (WM) is the ability to maintain information in the absence of sensory input. Attention is the process by which a specific target is selected for further processing, and neural resources directed toward that target. The content of WM can be used to direct attention, and attention can in turn determine which information is encoded into WM. Here we discuss the similarities between attention and WM and the role prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays in each. First, at the theoretical level, we describe how attention and WM can both rely on models based on attractor states. Then we review the evidence for an overlap between the areas involved in both functions, especially the frontal eye field (FEF) portion of the prefrontal cortex. We also discuss similarities between the neural changes in visual areas observed during attention and WM. At the cellular level, we review the literature on the role of prefrontal DA in both attention and WM at the behavioral and neural levels. Finally, we summarize the anatomical evidence for an overlap between prefrontal mechanisms involved in attention and WM. Altogether, a summary of pharmacological, electrophysiological, behavioral, and anatomical evidence for a contribution of the FEF part of prefrontal cortex to attention and WM is provided.

Indexed as

AttentionMemory, Short-TermPrefrontal CortexHumansAttentionDopamineWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID30739308
PMCPMC6689265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.