ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2019
Cellular Based Strategies for Microvascular Engineering.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering and Integrating Blood Vessel Organoids: a Comprehensive Blueprint for Physiological and Disease Modeling.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- An Advanced 3D Model of Vascularized Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in a Tumor-on-a-Chip System Based on Multi-Cell Culture.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reviewing vascular influences on neuronal migration, cortical development, and neurodevelopmental disorders: focus on autism, ADHD and schizophrenia.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Review
- Current Modalities in Soft-Tissue Reconstruction and Vascularized Adipose Engineering.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- NOS3 regulates angiogenic potential of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived endothelial cells.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024Article
- Tissue-Penetrating Ultrasound-Triggered Hydrogel for Promoting Microvascular Network Reconstruction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Alterations in Stem Cell Populations in IGF-1 Deficient Pediatric Patients Subjected to Mecasermin (Increlex) Treatment.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2023Article
- Nucleic Acid Delivery to the Vascular Endothelium.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- A rapidly magnetically assembled stem cell microtissue with "hamburger" architecture and enhanced vascularization capacity.Bioactive materials · 2021Article
- Co-Culture of Osteoblasts and Endothelial Cells on a Microfiber Scaffold to Construct Bone-Like Tissue with Vascular Networks.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Bone Tissue Regeneration in the Oral and Maxillofacial Region: A Review on the Application of Stem Cells and New Strategies to Improve Vascularization.Stem cells international · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vascularization is a major hurdle in complex tissue and organ engineering. Tissues greater than 200 μm in diameter cannot rely on simple diffusion to obtain nutrients and remove waste. Therefore, an integrated vascular network is required for clinical translation of engineered tissues. Microvessels have been described as <150 μm in diameter, but clinically they are defined as <1 mm. With new advances in super microsurgery, vessels less than 1 mm can be anastomosed to the recipient circulation. However, this technical advancement still relies on the creation of a stable engineered microcirculation that is amenable to surgical manipulation and is readily perfusable. Microvascular engineering lays on the crossroads of microfabrication, microfluidics, and tissue engineering strategies that utilize various cellular constituents. Early research focused on vascularization by co-culture and cellular interactions, with the addition of angiogenic growth factors to promote vascular growth. Since then, multiple strategies have been utilized taking advantage of innovations in additive manufacturing, biomaterials, and cell biology. However, the anatomy and dynamics of native blood vessels has not been consistently replicated. Inconsistent results can be partially attributed to cell sourcing which remains an enigma for microvascular engineering. Variations of endothelial cells, endothelial progenitor cells, and stem cells have all been used for microvascular network fabrication along with various mural cells. As each source offers advantages and disadvantages, there continues to be a lack of consensus. Furthermore, discord may be attributed to incomplete understanding about cell isolation and characterization without considering the microvascular architecture of the desired tissue/organ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30739276What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.