Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30739276›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2019

Cellular Based Strategies for Microvascular Engineering.

Srinivas V Koduru, Ashley N Leberfinger, Denis Pasic, Anoosha Forghani, Shane Lince, Daniel J Hayes, Ibrahim T Ozbolat, Dino J Ravnic

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Srinivas V KoduruIrvin S. Zubar Plastic Surgery Research Laboratory, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA. skoduru@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.
Ashley N LeberfingerIrvin S. Zubar Plastic Surgery Research Laboratory, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Denis PasicIrvin S. Zubar Plastic Surgery Research Laboratory, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Anoosha ForghaniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Materials Research Institute, The Huck Institutes of Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Shane LinceDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Daniel J HayesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Materials Research Institute, The Huck Institutes of Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Ibrahim T OzbolatDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Materials Research Institute, The Huck Institutes of Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Dino J RavnicIrvin S. Zubar Plastic Surgery Research Laboratory, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA. dravnic@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2261-5180

Funding

Career Development Program in Women's Health Research at Penn StateK12HD055882 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI WEISMAN, CAROL S · 2007 to 2016
$4.7M
Spatiotemporal Modulation of Osteogenesis in a 3-D Stromal/Stem Cell ModelR01DE024790 · NIDCR · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI HAYES, DANIEL J. · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS K12HD055882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascularization is a major hurdle in complex tissue and organ engineering. Tissues greater than 200 μm in diameter cannot rely on simple diffusion to obtain nutrients and remove waste. Therefore, an integrated vascular network is required for clinical translation of engineered tissues. Microvessels have been described as <150 μm in diameter, but clinically they are defined as <1 mm. With new advances in super microsurgery, vessels less than 1 mm can be anastomosed to the recipient circulation. However, this technical advancement still relies on the creation of a stable engineered microcirculation that is amenable to surgical manipulation and is readily perfusable. Microvascular engineering lays on the crossroads of microfabrication, microfluidics, and tissue engineering strategies that utilize various cellular constituents. Early research focused on vascularization by co-culture and cellular interactions, with the addition of angiogenic growth factors to promote vascular growth. Since then, multiple strategies have been utilized taking advantage of innovations in additive manufacturing, biomaterials, and cell biology. However, the anatomy and dynamics of native blood vessels has not been consistently replicated. Inconsistent results can be partially attributed to cell sourcing which remains an enigma for microvascular engineering. Variations of endothelial cells, endothelial progenitor cells, and stem cells have all been used for microvascular network fabrication along with various mural cells. As each source offers advantages and disadvantages, there continues to be a lack of consensus. Furthermore, discord may be attributed to incomplete understanding about cell isolation and characterization without considering the microvascular architecture of the desired tissue/organ.

Indexed as

Neovascularization, PhysiologicRegenerationAnimalsEndothelium, VascularHumansMicrocirculationMicrovesselsStem CellsTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAdipose tissueADSCsAdult stem cellsAngiogenesisCD34+Endothelial progenitor cellsEPCsiPSCsMicrovessel fragmentsMSCsVascularizationVasculogenesis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.