ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2019
Unbiased Screens for Modifiers of Alpha-Synuclein Toxicity.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cellular and systemic modifiers of alpha-synuclein proteostasis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026Review
- A genome-wide RNA interference screening reveals protectiveness of SNX5 knockdown in a Parkinson's disease cell model.Translational neurodegeneration · 2025Article
- VCP suppresses proteopathic seeding in neurons.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2022Article
- Activators of alpha synuclein expression identified by reporter cell line-based high throughput drug screen.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewWe provide an overview about unbiased screens to identify modifiers of alpha-synuclein (αSyn)-induced toxicity, present the models and the libraries that have been used for screening, and describe how hits from primary screens were selected and validated. RECENT
findingsScreens can be classified as either genetic or chemical compound modifier screens, but a few screens do not fit this classification. Most screens addressing αSyn-induced toxicity, including genome-wide overexpressing and deletion, were performed in yeast. More recently, newer methods such as CRISPR-Cas9 became available and were used for screening purposes. Paradoxically, given that αSyn-induced toxicity plays a role in neurological diseases, there is a shortage of human cell-based models for screening. Moreover, most screens used mutant or fluorescently tagged forms of αSyn and only very few screens investigated wild-type αSyn. Particularly, no genome-wide αSyn toxicity screen in human dopaminergic neurons has been published so far. Most unbiased screens for modifiers of αSyn toxicity were performed in yeast, and there is a lack of screens performed in human and particularly dopaminergic cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.