Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30739243›Full record

ArticlePlant molecular biology2019

Resistant and susceptible cacao genotypes exhibit defense gene polymorphism and unique early responses to Phytophthora megakarya inoculation.

Désiré N Pokou, Andrew S Fister, Noah Winters, Mathias Tahi, Coulibaly Klotioloma, Aswathy Sebastian, James H Marden, Siela N Maximova, Mark J Guiltinan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Désiré N PokouCentre National de Recherche Agronomique, Laboratoire Central de Biotechnologie, 01 BP 1740, Abidjan 01, Côte d'Ivoire.
Andrew S FisterDepartment of Plant Sciences, Life Sciences Building, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Noah WintersIntercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Mathias TahiCentre National de Recherche Agronomique, Laboratoire Central de Biotechnologie, 01 BP 1740, Abidjan 01, Côte d'Ivoire.
Coulibaly KlotiolomaCentre National de Recherche Agronomique, Laboratoire Central de Biotechnologie, 01 BP 1740, Abidjan 01, Côte d'Ivoire.
Aswathy SebastianThe Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
James H MardenThe Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Siela N MaximovaDepartment of Plant Sciences, Life Sciences Building, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Mark J GuiltinanDepartment of Plant Sciences, Life Sciences Building, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. mjg9@psu.edu.
Pennsylvania State University · USCentre National de Recherche Agronomique · CI

Funding

Fulbright Association G-1-0005National Institute of Food and Agriculture 1003147National Science Foundation 1546863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageKey genes potentially involved in cacao disease resistance were identified by transcriptomic analysis of important cacao cultivars. Defense gene polymorphisms were identified which could contribute to pathogen recognition capacity. Cacao suffers significant annual losses to the water mold Phytophthora spp. (Oomycetes). In West Africa, P. megakarya poses a major threat to farmer livelihood and the stability of cocoa production. As part of a long-term goal to define key disease resistance genes in cacao, here we use a transcriptomic analysis of the disease-resistant cacao clone SCA6 and the susceptible clone NA32 to characterize basal differences in gene expression, early responses to infection, and polymorphisms in defense genes. Gene expression measurements by RNA-seq along a time course revealed the strongest transcriptomic response 24 h after inoculation in the resistant genotype. We observed strong regulation of several pathogenesis-related genes, pattern recognition receptors, and resistance genes, which could be critical for the ability of SCA6 to combat infection. These classes of genes also showed differences in basal expression between the two genotypes prior to infection, suggesting that prophylactic expression of defense-associated genes could contribute to SCA6's broad-spectrum disease resistance. Finally, we analyzed polymorphism in a set of defense-associated receptors, identifying coding variants between SCA6 and NA32 which could contribute to unique capacities for pathogen recognition. This work is an important step toward characterizing genetic differences underlying a successful defense response in cacao.

Indexed as

GenotypePolymorphism, GeneticCacaoDisease ResistanceGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantPhytophthoraPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesRNA, PlantTranscriptomeRNA, PlantDefense responsePhytophthora megakaryaTheobroma cacaoTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID30739243
OpenAlexW2912446324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.