Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30739237›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2019

Probiotic characteristics of bacteriocin-producing Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from human milk and colostrum.

Ufuk Bagci, Sine Ozmen Togay, Ayhan Temiz, Mustafa Ay

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Aquaculture nutrition · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Functional efficacy ofFuture microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The alleviating effects and mechanisms ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  9. Whole-genome sequencing ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Streptococcus strain D19BMC microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Potential ProbioticFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ufuk BagciDepartment of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Trakya University, 22180, Edirne, Turkey. ufukbagci@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1511-2465
Sine Ozmen TogayDepartment of Food Engineering, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.
Ayhan TemizDepartment of Food Engineering, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Mustafa AyDepartment of Food Technology, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey.
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ · TRÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi · TRHacettepe University · TRTrakya University · TR

Funding

Hacettepe ?niversitesi 4753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As potential probiotic traits of human milk-isolated bacteria have increasingly been recognized, this study aimed to evaluate the probiotic properties of bacteriocin-producing Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from human milk and colostrum. Among 118 human milk- and colostrum-isolated lactic cocci, only 29 were identified as Enterococcus. Of these, only four Enterococcus faecium isolates exhibited bacteriocigenic activity against several pathogenic Gram-positive bacteria, including Listeria monocytogenes. These isolates exhibited high acid (up to pH 3.0) and bile tolerance (0.5% oxgall) in simulated gastrointestinal conditions, demonstrating their ability to survive through the upper gastrointestinal tract. All of the E. faecium strains were shown to be sensitive to most of the antibiotics including vancomycin, tetracycline, rifampicin, and erythromycin, while they were resistant to kanamycin and chloramphenicol. None of the strains showed any virulence (gelE, agg2, clyA, clyB, clyM) and antibiotic resistance genes (vanA, vanB, ermB, tetM, and aac(6')-le-aph(2″)-la). In addition, all the strains were able to assimilate cholesterol, ranging between 25.2-64.1% and they exhibited variable adherence (19-36%) to Caco-2 cells. Based on the overall results of this in vitro study, four of the E. faecium strains isolated from human milk and colostrum can be considered as promising probiotic candidates; however, further in vivo evaluations are required.

Indexed as

ProbioticsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiosisBacterial AdhesionBacteriocinsBile Acids and SaltsCaco-2 CellsCholesterolColostrumDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterococcus faeciumGastric JuiceHumansListeria monocytogenesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMilk, HumanAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriocinsBile Acids and SaltsCholesterol

Identifiers

PMID30739237
OpenAlexW2912714485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.