ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2019
Evaluation of early changes of macular function and morphology by multifocal electroretinograms in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy.
Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuroinflammation in Radiation Maculopathy: A Pathophysiologic and Imaging Perspective.Cancers · 2025Review
- Identification of clusters in multifocal electrophysiology recordings to maximize discriminant capacity (patients vs. control subjects).Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the role of multifocal electroretinograms (mfERGs) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for detecting early changes in macular functions of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after radiotherapy.
methodsmfERGs and OCT were used to examine a NPC group (36 NPC patients after radiotherapy without clinically visible radiation retinopathy, 36 eyes) and a normal control group (25 healthy individuals, 25 eyes) with the same procedure and parameters. The two groups of mfERG were summarized by calculating ring averages, response density, N1 amplitude and P1 and N1 latencies were analysed. OCT scan thickness was summarized into ETDRS regions for comparison.
resultsCompared with controls, the NPC group had significantly decreased P1 response densities in 1-4 ring regions and N1 amplitudes in 1-3 rings (P < 0.01). P1 latencies were obviously prolonged in rings 1 (P < 0.01). In four quadrants (inferonasal, superonasal, inferotemporal and superotemporal) of the mfERG response waveforms, the NPC group had significantly decreased P1 response densities and N1 amplitudes mainly in the inferonasal and inferotemporal quadrants, showing statistically significant differences from the control group (P < 0.0125). But for the OCT results, there is no statistically significant difference between the NPC group and the control group.
conclusionsIn NPC patients after radiotherapy, there may be changes in the mfERGs before any visible fundus lesions appeared as radiation macular oedema. Since the global OCT macular thickness analysis cannot reveal early changes, the mfERGs can objectively and quantitatively assess the earlier changes in macular function in NPC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.