Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30739183›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2019

Infliximab biosimilar for treating neurosarcoidosis: tolerance and efficacy in a retrospective study including switch from the originator and initiation of treatment.

Quentin Riller, Camille Cotteret, Helga Junot, Neila Benameur, Julien Haroche, Alexis Mathian, Miguel Hie, Makoto Miyara, Patrick Tilleul, Zahir Amoura and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Infliximab in neurosarcoidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Neurosarcoidosis.Journal of neurology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Common Clinical and Molecular Pathways between Migraine and Sarcoidosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Quentin RillerSorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Médecine Interne 2, Centre National de Référence Maladies Systémiques Rares, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83 Boulevard de l'hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.
Camille CotteretAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Département de Pharmacie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France.
Helga JunotAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Département de Pharmacie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France.
Neila BenameurAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Département de Pharmacie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France.
Julien HarocheSorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Médecine Interne 2, Centre National de Référence Maladies Systémiques Rares, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83 Boulevard de l'hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.
Alexis MathianSorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Médecine Interne 2, Centre National de Référence Maladies Systémiques Rares, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83 Boulevard de l'hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.
Miguel HieSorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Médecine Interne 2, Centre National de Référence Maladies Systémiques Rares, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83 Boulevard de l'hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.
Makoto MiyaraSorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Département d'immunochimie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France.
Patrick TilleulAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Département de Pharmacie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France.
Zahir AmouraSorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Médecine Interne 2, Centre National de Référence Maladies Systémiques Rares, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83 Boulevard de l'hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.
Fleur Cohen AubartSorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Médecine Interne 2, Centre National de Référence Maladies Systémiques Rares, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83 Boulevard de l'hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France. fleur.cohen@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7610-4995
Sorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesInfliximab is increasingly used to treat neurosarcoidosis. We aimed to determine the efficacy and tolerance of an infliximab biosimilar for treating neurosarcoidosis.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective single-center study to describe the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of an infliximab biosimilar in neurosarcoidosis patients. We compared the survival time without relapse while receiving the biosimilar or previous originator-infliximab treatment.

resultsTwenty patients with histologically documented neurosarcoidosis were treated with an infliximab biosimilar (initiation of treatment in 12 and switch from the originator drug in 8) between February 2016 and August 2018. All patients presenting with neurological involvement of one or more areas, including meningeal (n = 15), cerebral (n = 10), spinal cord (n = 9), and/or cranial nerves (n = 5); epilepsy (n = 3); and/or intracranial hypertension (n = 3) were enrolled. Eighteen patients received glucocorticoids during infliximab treatment, and 16 had methotrexate or azathioprine concomitant treatment. The median duration of follow-up was 25 months (19-28). Six patients relapsed during biosimilar treatment. Relapse rates and time-to-relapse did not differ between the infliximab originator previously received and biosimilar treatment groups (p = 0.40 and 0.51, respectively). Nine patients experienced 11 adverse events with the infliximab biosimilar, including infections (n = 5), urticaria (n = 4), headache (n = 1), and diarrhea (n = 1). All side effects were grade 2 or less using the WHO classification.

conclusionsIn this retrospective study, the infliximab biosimilar was efficacious and safe for treating neurosarcoidosis.

Indexed as

Drug SubstitutionAdultAntirheumatic AgentsAzathioprineBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsCentral Nervous System DiseasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfliximabMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSarcoidosisStatistics, NonparametricAntirheumatic AgentsAzathioprineBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsInfliximabMethotrexateBiosimilarsInfliximabNeurosarcoidosis

Identifiers

PMID30739183
OpenAlexW2911287680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.