Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30739176›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2019

Ectoine lozenges in the treatment of acute viral pharyngitis: a prospective, active-controlled clinical study.

Van-Anh Dao, Sabrina Overhagen, Andreas Bilstein, Carina Kolot, Uwe Sonnemann, Ralph Mösges

Open access · hybridAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fullerenol CInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Effectiveness and Tolerability of EctoinJournal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Targeting the EGFR-ERK axis using the compatible solute ectoine to stabilize CFTR mutant F508del.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Van-Anh DaoCRI-Clinical Research International Ltd., Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6174-8309
Sabrina Overhagenbitop AG, Dortmund, Germany.
Andreas Bilsteinbitop AG, Dortmund, Germany. bilstein@bitop.de.
Carina Kolotbitop AG, Dortmund, Germany.
Uwe SonnemannPrivate Health Centre, Institute for ENT Elmshorn, Elmshorn, Germany.
Ralph MösgesCRI-Clinical Research International Ltd., Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1928-810X
Bitop (Germany) · DE

Funding

bitop AG Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAcute pharyngitis is an uncomfortable disorder mostly caused by viruses and for which antibiotics are unwarranted. This study compared lozenges containing ectoine, a natural extremolyte, with hyaluronic acid lozenges and hypertonic saline gargle for symptomatic treatment of acute viral pharyngitis.

methodsThis prospective, controlled clinical study, recruited 90 patients with moderate-to-severe pharyngitis symptoms who chose to use either ectoine (n = 35), hyaluronic acid (n = 35), or saline gargle (n = 20). Patients applied their 7-day treatment from the inclusion visit (V1) until the end-of-study visit (V2). Patients' pharyngitis symptoms, general health, general treatment effectiveness and tolerability, and patient compliance were assessed by investigators and patients.

resultsThe sum score for three primary symptoms (pain on swallowing, urge to cough, and hoarseness) decreased by 79.5% (ectoine), 72.2% (hyaluronic acid), and 44.8% (saline gargle). Both lozenges were significantly superior to saline gargle (P < 0.05). Regarding general health improvement, ectoine was significantly superior to saline gargle (72.5% vs. 45.2%, P < 0.05), but hyaluronic acid (63.3%) was not. At V2, 65.7% of patients receiving ectoine reported "very good" general health vs. 48.6% of those receiving hyaluronic acid and 20.0% using saline gargle. Ectoine was significantly superior (P < 0.05) to both hyaluronic acid and saline gargle in terms of tolerability and patient compliance. No patients taking ectoine reported unpleasant sensations while applying their treatment, whereas almost half of patients using hyaluronic acid lozenges and saline gargle did.

conclusionTreatment with ectoine lozenges significantly relieves moderate-to-severe symptoms of acute viral pharyngitis and is more effective and tolerable than treatments with hyaluronic acid lozenges and hypertonic saline gargle.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdministration, OralAdultAgedAmino Acids, DiaminoCoughDeglutitionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHoarsenessHumansHyaluronic AcidMaleMiddle AgedPainPain MeasurementAmino Acids, DiaminoectoineHyaluronic AcidSaline Solution, HypertonicAcute pharyngitisEctoineEctoine lozengesSore throat

Identifiers

PMID30739176
PMCPMC6411829
OpenAlexW2914211155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.