Observational studyJACC. Heart failure2019
Target Doses of Heart Failure Medical Therapy and Blood Pressure: Insights From the CHAMP-HF Registry.
Observational study in JACC. Heart failure, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ten years real-world experience with sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2026Pooled it
- Early Initiation of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Pooled it
- In-Hospital or Out-of-Hospital Initiation of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Valsartan in Patients With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction After A Worsening Heart Failure Event: The PARAGLIDE-HF Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Clinical impact of guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with left ventricular assist device: an international multicentre study.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Improving Heart Failure Discharge Care Through a Resident-Led Quality Improvement Initiative.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Structured Functional Assessment Pathway and Pharmacological Optimization During Cardiovascular Rehabilitation in Chronic Heart Failure: A Retrospective Tertiary Center Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Contemporary Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy for Heart Failure in the United States: The EMPACE Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Observational
- Intensive blood pressure control in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a symptom-modifying strategy.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Independent risk factors of hypertension in patients with chronic heart failure: insights from univariate and multivariate analyses.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Early in-hospital treatment of acute heart failure. Part 2 of the international expert opinion series on AHF management.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
- Sacubitril/Valsartan, Heart Failure and Risk of Dementia.Drugs & aging · 2025Article
- Comparative effectiveness of the Beers Criteria (2023) versus the STOPP (v3) in detecting potentially inappropriate medications in older adults with heart failure: a retrospective cross-sectional study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Achieved targeted heart rate following ivabradine therapy correlates with left ventricular reverse remodeling in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Heart Failure: Is the Guideline-Practice Gap Narrowing?JACC. Asia · 2025Article
- Up-titration of medication in patients with new-onset heart failure with and without atrial fibrillation.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Association of Medication Adherence and Health Status in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insights From the CHAMP-HF Registry.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2024Observational
- Use and Benefit of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Elderly Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Optimization of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy During Hospitalization for Heart Failure: Mind the Gap!JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Generalizable Approach to Quantifying Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy.Circulation. Heart failure · 2024Review
- Initiation and continuation of pharmacological therapies in patients hospitalized for heart failure in Japan.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study sought to determine the rate of use of target doses of foundational guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in a contemporary cohort of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) across systolic blood pressure (SBP) categories.
backgroundPatients with HFrEF are infrequently titrated to recommended doses of GDMT. The relationship between SBP and achieving GDMT target doses is not well studied.
methodsPatients enrolled in the CHAMP-HF (Change the Management of Patients With Heart Failure) registry without documented intolerance to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), and beta blockers (BBs) were assessed at enrollment. We estimated the proportion receiving target doses (% of target dose [95% confidence interval (CI)]) based on the most recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Failure Society of America heart failure guidelines at baseline in all patients, and by SBP category (≥110 vs. <110 mm Hg).
resultsOf the 3,095 patients eligible for analysis, 2,421 (78.2%) had SBP ≥110 mm Hg. The proportion of patients receiving target doses were 18.7% (95% CI: 17.3% to 20.0%; BB), 10.8% (95% CI: 9.7% to 11.9%; ACEI/ARB), and 2.0% (95% CI: 1.5% to 2.5%; ARNI). Among those with SBP <110 mm Hg (n = 674), 17.5% (95% CI: 14.6% to 20.4%; BB), 6.2% (95% CI: 4.4% to 8.1%; ACEI/ARB), and 1.8% (95% CI: 0.8% to 2.8%; ARNI) were receiving target doses. Among those with SBP ≥110 mm Hg (n = 2,421), 19.0% (95% CI: 17.4% to 20.6%; BB), 12.1% (95% CI: 10.8% to 13.4%; ACEI/ARB), and 2.0% (95% CI: 1.5% to 2.6%; ARNI) were receiving target doses.
conclusionsIn a large, contemporary registry of outpatients with chronic HFrEF eligible for treatment with BBs and ACEI/ARB/ARNI, <20% of patients were receiving target doses, even among those with SBP ≥110 mm Hg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.