Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30738946›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2019

ADEpedia-on-OHDSI: A next generation pharmacovigilance signal detection platform using the OHDSI common data model.

Yue Yu, Kathryn J Ruddy, Na Hong, Shintaro Tsuji, Andrew Wen, Nilay D Shah, Guoqian Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Toward a unified understanding of drug-drug interactions: mapping Japanese drug codes to RxNorm concepts.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical Research Informatics.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Integrating Electronic Health Record Data into the ADEpedia-on-OHDSI Platform for Improved Signal Detection: A Case Study of Immune-related Adverse Events.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yue YuDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kathryn J RuddyDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Na HongDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Shintaro TsujiDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Andrew WenDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Nilay D ShahDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Guoqian JiangDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: Jiang.Guoqian@mayo.edu.

Funding

Tools for standardizing clinical research metadata using HL7 FHIRU01HG009450 · NHGRI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, GUOQIAN · 2016 to 2018
$1.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSupplementing the Spontaneous Reporting System (SRS) with Electronic Health Record (EHR) data for adverse drug reaction detection could augment sample size, increase population heterogeneity and cross-validate results for pharmacovigilance research. The difference in the underlying data structures and terminologies between SRS and EHR data presents challenges when attempting to integrate the two into a single database. The Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) collaboration provides a Common Data Model (CDM) for organizing and standardizing EHR data to support large-scale observational studies. The objective of the study is to develop and evaluate an informatics platform known as ADEpedia-on-OHDSI, where spontaneous reporting data from FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) is converted into the OHDSI CDM format towards building a next generation pharmacovigilance signal detection platform.

methodsAn extraction, transformation and loading (ETL) tool was designed, developed, and implemented to convert FAERS data into the OHDSI CDM format. A comprehensive evaluation, including overall ETL evaluation, mapping quality evaluation of drug names to RxNorm, and an evaluation of transformation and imputation quality, was then performed to assess the mapping accuracy and information loss using the FAERS data collected between 2012 and 2017. Previously published findings related to vascular safety profile of triptans were validated using ADEpedia-on-OHDSI in pharmacovigilance research. For the triptan-related vascular event detection, signals were detected by Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) in high-level group terms (HLGT) level, high-level terms (HLT) level and preferred term (PT) level using the original FAERS data and CDM-based FAERS respectively. In addition, six standardized MedDRA queries (SMQs) related to vascular events were applied.

resultsA total of 4,619,362 adverse event cases were loaded into 8 tables in the OHDSI CDM. For drug name mapping, 93.9% records and 47.0% unique names were matched with RxNorm codes. Mapping accuracy of drug names was 96% based on a manual verification of randomly sampled 500 unique mappings. Information loss evaluation showed that more than 93% of the data is loaded into the OHDSI CDM for most fields, with the exception of drug route data (66%). The replication study detected 5, 18, 47 and 6, 18, 50 triptan-related vascular event signals in MedDRA HLGT level, HLT level, and PT level for the original FAERS data and CDM-based FAERS respectively. The signal detection scores of six standardized MedDRA queries (SMQs) of vascular events in the raw data study were found to be lower than those scores in the CDM study.

conclusionThe outcome of this work would facilitate seamless integration and combined analyses of both SRS and EHR data for pharmacovigilance in ADEpedia-on-OHDSI, our platform for next generation pharmacovigilance.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsComputer SimulationPharmacovigilanceHumansUnited StatesData StandardizationETL toolFAERSOHDSI Common Data ModelPharmacovigilance

Identifiers

PMID30738946
PMCPMC6432939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.