Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30738835›Full record

ReviewProgress in neurobiology2019

The roles of supervised machine learning in systems neuroscience.

Joshua I Glaser, Ari S Benjamin, Roozbeh Farhoodi, Konrad P Kording

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in neurobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua I GlaserDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, United States. Electronic address: jglaser8@seas.upenn.edu.
Ari S BenjaminDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, United States. Electronic address: aarrii@seas.upenn.edu.
Roozbeh FarhoodiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, United States. Electronic address: roozbeh@seas.upenn.edu.
Konrad P KordingDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, United States; Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, United States; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Canada. Electronic address: kording@seas.upenn.edu.

Funding

The role of uncertainty in human motor learning and adaptationR01NS063399 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KORDING, KONRAD P. · 2009 to 2019
$2.8M
Deciding Where to Look Next: Frontal Eye Field's Role during Natural ViewingF31EY025532 · NEI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GLASER, JOSHUA I · 2015 to 2017
$109k
NEI NIH HHS F31 EY025532NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS063399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last several years, the use of machine learning (ML) in neuroscience has been rapidly increasing. Here, we review ML's contributions, both realized and potential, across several areas of systems neuroscience. We describe four primary roles of ML within neuroscience: (1) creating solutions to engineering problems, (2) identifying predictive variables, (3) setting benchmarks for simple models of the brain, and (4) serving itself as a model for the brain. The breadth and ease of its applicability suggests that machine learning should be in the toolbox of most systems neuroscientists.

Indexed as

BrainSupervised Machine LearningAnimalsHumansNeurosciencesDeep learningMachine learningModelingNeural activityNeuroanatomySupervised learningSystems neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID30738835
PMCPMC8454059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.