Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30738562›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nutrition education and behavior2019

Process Evaluation of Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities: A Rural Community-Based Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Program.

Urshila Sriram, Kirstin Sandreuter, Meredith Graham, Sara Folta, Kristin Pullyblank, Lynn Paul, Rebecca Seguin

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effects of the Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities Intervention on Functional Fitness of Rural Women.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Urshila SriramDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Kirstin SandreuterDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Meredith GrahamDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Sara FoltaFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA.
Kristin PullyblankBassett Research Institute, Cooperstown, NY.
Lynn PaulCollege of Education, Health and Development, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.
Rebecca SeguinDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Electronic address: rs946@cornell.edu.

Funding

Strong Hearts_Healthy Communities_A Rural Community CVD Prevention ProgramR01HL120702 · NHLBI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI SEGUIN-FOWLER, REBECCA ANNE · 2014 to 2017
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL120702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the implementation of a community-based cardiovascular disease prevention program for rural women: Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities (SHHC).

designMixed-methods process evaluation. SETTING/

participantsA total of 101 women from 8 rural towns were enrolled in the SHHC program; 93 were enrolled as controls. Eligible participants were aged ≥40 years, sedentary, and overweight or obese. Local health educators (n = 15) served as program leaders within each town. OUTCOME MEASURES: Reach, fidelity, dose delivered, dose received, and program satisfaction were assessed using after-class surveys, participant satisfaction surveys, interviews with program leaders, and participant focus groups. ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests of independence, and thematic analysis were employed.

resultsIntervention sites reported high levels of fidelity (82%) and dose delivered (84%). Overall reach was 2.6% and program classes were rated as effective (3.9/5). Participants were satisfied with their experience and reported benefits such as camaraderie and awareness of healthy eating and exercise strategies. Common recommendations included increasing class time and enhancing group discussion. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Implementation was good in terms of fidelity, dose delivered, and satisfaction, although low reach. Findings from this research have informed a second round of implementation and evaluation of the SHHC program in rural communities.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleFocus GroupsHealth EducationHumansMiddle AgedMontanaNew YorkNutritional SciencesOverweightProgram EvaluationRisk Factorscardiovascular diseasehealth promotionprogram evaluationrural populationwomen's health

Identifiers

PMID30738562
PMCPMC6422156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.