Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30738383›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics2019

Use of magnetic resonance imaging in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury: assessment of current practice.

Peter A Ferrazzano, Bedda L Rosario, Stephen R Wisniewski, Nadeem I Shafi, Heather M Siefkes, Darryl K Miles, Andrew L Alexander, Michael J Bell

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Update on the role of S100B in traumatic brain injury in pediatric population: a meta-analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. An update on pediatric traumatic brain injury.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Clinical guidelines for traumatic brain injuries in children and boys.European journal of translational myology · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter A FerrazzanoDepartments of1Pediatrics.
Bedda L Rosario4Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Stephen R Wisniewski4Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Nadeem I Shafi5Pediatrics, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee.
Heather M Siefkes6Pediatrics, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, California.
Darryl K Miles7Pediatrics, University of Texas-Southwestern, Dallas, Texas; and.
Andrew L Alexander2Medical Physics, and.
Michael J Bell8Pediatrics, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC.
University of Pittsburgh · USCentre for Biomedical Engineering and Physics · SEChildren's National · USPediatrics and Genetics · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Multiple Medical Therapies for Pediatric TBI; Comparative Effectiveness ApproachU01NS081041 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BELL, MICHAEL J, WISNIEWSKI, STEPHEN R · 2013 to 2017
$15.9M
Waisman Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center Down Syndrome RegistryU54HD090256 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MESSING, ALBEE · 2016 to 2020
$6.0M
Research_ProjectU54HD090257 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VITTORIO GALLO, VITTORIO GALLO VITTORIO GALLO · 2016 to 2020
$5.9M
MRI markers of functional outcome after severe pediatric TBIR01NS092870 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ALEXANDER, ANDREW L, FERRAZZANO, PETER A · 2016 to 2019
$2.2M
Age-dependent microglial responses in hypoxia-ischemiaK08NS078113 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FERRAZZANO, PETER A · 2013 to 2017
$967k
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090256NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090257NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS078113NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092870NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS081041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is no consensus on the optimal timing and specific brain MRI sequences in the evaluation and management of severe pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI), and information on current practices is lacking. The authors performed a survey of MRI practices among sites participating in a multicenter study of severe pediatric TBI to provide information for designing future clinical trials using MRI to assess brain injury after severe pediatric TBI.

methodsInformation on current imaging practices and resources was collected from 27 institutions participating in the Approaches and Decisions after Pediatric TBI Trial. Multiple-choice questions addressed the percentage of patients with TBI who have MRI studies, timing of MRI, MRI sequences used to investigate TBI, as well as the magnetic field strength of MR scanners used at the participating institutions and use of standardized MRI protocols for imaging after severe pediatric TBI.

resultsOverall, the reported use of MRI in pediatric patients with severe TBI at participating sites was high, with 40% of sites indicating that they obtain MRI studies in > 95% of this patient population. Differences were observed in the frequency of MRI use between US and international sites, with the US sites obtaining MRI in a higher proportion of their pediatric patients with severe TBI (94% of US vs 44% of international sites reported MRI in at least 70% of patients with severe TBI). The reported timing and composition of MRI studies was highly variable across sites. Sixty percent of sites reported typically obtaining an MRI study within the first 7 days postinjury, with the remainder of responses distributed throughout the first 30-day postinjury period. Responses indicated that MRI sequences sensitive for diffuse axonal injury and ischemia are frequently obtained in patients with TBI, whereas perfusion imaging and spectroscopy techniques are less common.

conclusionsResults from this survey suggest that despite the lack of consensus or guidelines, MRI is commonly obtained during the acute clinical setting after severe pediatric TBI. The variation in MRI practices highlights the need for additional studies to determine the utility, optimal timing, and composition of clinical MRI studies after TBI. The information in this survey describes current clinical MRI practices in children with severe TBI and identifies important challenges and objectives that should be considered when designing future studies.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticChildChild, PreschoolEuropeFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleGlobal HealthHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareTime FactorsUnited StatesACR = American College of RadiologyADAPT = Approaches and Decisions after Pediatric TBIDAI = diffuse axonal injuryDTI = diffusion tensor imagingDWI = diffusion-weighted imagingGCS = Glasgow Coma ScaleGOS-E Peds = Pediatric Glasgow Outcome Scale–ExtendedGRE = gradient recalled echoICP = intracranial pressuremagnetic resonance imagingMRS = MR spectroscopypediatric traumatic brain injuryPICU = pediatric intensive care unitPWI = perfusion-weighted imagingsurveySWI = susceptibility-weighted imagingTBI = traumatic brain injurytrauma

Identifiers

PMID30738383
PMCPMC6687576
OpenAlexW2917911851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.