Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30738328›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2019

Microtubule control of functional architecture in neurons.

Michael T Kelliher, Harriet Aj Saunders, Jill Wildonger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A tubulin-MAPKKK pathway engages tubulin isotype interaction for neuroprotection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael T KelliherIntegrated Program in Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA; Biochemistry Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Harriet Aj SaundersIntegrated Program in Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA; Biochemistry Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Jill WildongerBiochemistry Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Electronic address: wildonger@wisc.edu.

Funding

MOLECULAR MOTORS AND NEURONAL MICROTUBULE POLARITYR01NS102385 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WILDONGER, JILL C · 2017 to 2022
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons are exquisitely polarized cells whose structure and function relies on microtubules. Microtubules in signal-receiving dendrites and signal-sending axons differ in their organization and microtubule-associated proteins. These differences, coupled with microtubule post-translational modifications, combine to locally regulate intracellular transport, morphology, and function. Recent discoveries provide new insight into the regulation of non-centrosomal microtubule arrays in neurons, the relationship between microtubule acetylation and mechanosensation, and the spatial patterning of microtubules that regulates motor activity and cargo delivery in axons and dendrites. Together, these new studies bring us closer to understanding how microtubule function is locally tuned to match the specialized tasks associated with signal reception and transmission.

Indexed as

MicrotubulesNeuronsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30738328
PMCPMC6629488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.