Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30738207›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

Multi-atlas tool for automated segmentation of brain gray matter nuclei and quantification of their magnetic susceptibility.

Xu Li, Lin Chen, Kwame Kutten, Can Ceritoglu, Yue Li, Ningdong Kang, John T Hsu, Ye Qiao, Hongjiang Wei, Chunlei Liu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mesoscale Whole-Brain TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. TImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Improved test-retest reliability ofMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Xu LiDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: xuli@mri.jhu.edu.
Lin ChenDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Electronic Science, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Kwame KuttenCenter for Imaging Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Can CeritogluCenter for Imaging Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yue LiDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ningdong KangDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
John T HsuDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ye QiaoDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hongjiang WeiDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Chunlei LiuDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Michael I MillerCenter for Imaging Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Susumu MoriDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
David M YousemDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Peter C M van ZijlDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Andreia V FariaDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: afaria1@jhmi.edu.

Funding

TR&D 4: Algorithms for functional and anatomical brain analysisP41EB015909 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM · 2012 to 2020
$13.1M
Continued Development and Maintenance of MriStudioR01NS084957 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, MICHAEL I, MORI, SUSUMU · 2013 to 2022
$3.6M
Contribution of Cerebral Iron Load to Elderly Individuals with High Risk to Develop Alzheimer's Disease.R21AG061668 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LI, XU, QIAO, YE · 2019 to 2020
$466k
Contribution of Cerebral Iron Load to Cognitive Function in Older Adults with High Risk to Develop Alzheimer's DiseaseR56AG063842 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LI, XU, QIAO, YE · 2019 to 2019
$425k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG061668NIA NIH HHS R56 AG063842NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015909NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS084957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantification of tissue magnetic susceptibility using MRI offers a non-invasive measure of important tissue components in the brain, such as iron and myelin, potentially providing valuable information about normal and pathological conditions during aging. Despite many advances made in recent years on imaging techniques of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), accurate and robust automated segmentation tools for QSM images that can help generate universal and sharable susceptibility measures in a biologically meaningful set of structures are still not widely available. In the present study, we developed an automated process to segment brain nuclei and quantify tissue susceptibility in these regions based on a susceptibility multi-atlas library, consisting of 10 atlases with T1-weighted images, gradient echo (GRE) magnitude images and QSM images of brains with different anatomic patterns. For each atlas in this library, 10 regions of interest in iron-rich deep gray matter structures that are better defined by QSM contrast were manually labeled, including caudate, putamen, globus pallidus internal/external, thalamus, pulvinar, subthalamic nucleus, substantia nigra, red nucleus and dentate nucleus in both left and right hemispheres. We then tested different pipelines using different combinations of contrast channels to bring the set of labels from the multi-atlases to each target brain and compared them with the gold standard manual delineation. The results showed that the segmentation accuracy using dual contrasts QSM/T1 pipeline outperformed other dual-contrast or single-contrast pipelines. The dice values of 0.77 ± 0.09 using the QSM/T1 multi-atlas pipeline rivaled with the segmentation reliability obtained from multiple evaluators with dice values of 0.79 ± 0.07 and gave comparable or superior performance in segmenting subcortical nuclei in comparison with standard FSL FIRST or recent multi-atlas package of volBrain. The segmentation performance of the QSM/T1 multi-atlas was further tested on QSM images acquired using different acquisition protocols and platforms and showed good reliability and reproducibility with average dice of 0.79 ± 0.08 to manual labels and 0.89 ± 0.04 in an inter-protocol manner. The extracted quantitative magnetic susceptibility values in the deep gray matter nuclei also correlated well between different protocols with inter-protocol correlation constants all larger than 0.97. Such reliability and performance was ultimately validated in an external dataset acquired at another study site with consistent susceptibility measures obtained using the QSM/T1 multi-atlas approach in comparison to those using manual delineation. In summary, we designed a susceptibility multi-atlas tool for automated and reliable segmentation of QSM images and for quantification of magnetic susceptibilities. It is publicly available through our cloud-based platform (www.mricloud.org). Further improvement on the performance of this multi-atlas tool is expected by increasing the number of atlases in the future.

Indexed as

Atlases as TopicBrainGray MatterAdultAgedBrain MappingDatasets as TopicFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedAtlasAutomated segmentationQSMSusceptibility quantificationSWI

Identifiers

PMID30738207
PMCPMC6464637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.