Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30738077›Full record

ReviewJournal of hepatology2019

Combined locoregional-immunotherapy for liver cancer.

Tim F Greten, Michal Mauda-Havakuk, Bernd Heinrich, Firouzeh Korangy, Bradford J Wood

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hepatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 204 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tim F GretenGastrointestinal Malignancies Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, United States; NCI CCR Liver Cancer Program, United States. Electronic address: tim.greten@nih.gov.
Michal Mauda-HavakukCenter for Interventional Oncology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, NIH Clinical Center & Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, United States; NIBIB & NIH Clinical Center Clinical Translational Research Fellowship Program, United States.
Bernd HeinrichGastrointestinal Malignancies Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, United States.
Firouzeh KorangyGastrointestinal Malignancies Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, United States.
Bradford J WoodCenter for Interventional Oncology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, NIH Clinical Center & Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, United States; NCI CCR Liver Cancer Program, United States.
National Institutes of Health · USCenter for Cancer Research · US

Funding

Center for Interventional OncologyZIDBC011242 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WOOD, BRADFORD J · 2009 to 2025
$18.7M
Interventional OncologyZIACL040015 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI WOOD, BRADFORD · 2009 to 2025
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CL040015Intramural NIH HHS ZID BC011242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Locoregional therapies are commonly used to treat patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. It has been noted for many years that locoregional therapies may have additional systemic effects other than simple tumour elimination. Immunological "side effects" have been described in response to locoregional therapies in animal studies and in patients. With the advent of immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma, there is increasing interest in determining the best way to combine immunotherapy with locoregional therapies. Herein, we provide a compact summary of answered and unanswered questions in the field, including: What animal model is best suited to test combined immune-locoregional treatments? How does tumour cell death affect immune responses? What type of immune responses have been observed in patients treated with different types of locoregional therapies? What can be surmised from the results of the first study testing the combination of locoregional therapy with immune checkpoint blockade? Finally, we discuss the outlook for this rapidly growing area of research, focussing on the issues which must be overcome to bridge the gap between interventional radiology and cancer immunology.

Indexed as

AnimalsChemoembolization, TherapeuticCTLA-4 AntigenDisease Models, AnimalHumansImmunotherapyLiver NeoplasmsMyeloid-Derived Suppressor CellsRadiofrequency AblationCTLA-4 AntigenCell deathLocoregional therapyRadiofrequency ablationT cellTumour immunology

Identifiers

PMID30738077
PMCPMC6462230
OpenAlexW2911646196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.