Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30737910›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2019

Diagnostic performance of receptor-specific surgical specimen staining correlates with receptor expression level.

Jasmin M Schaefer, Connor W Barth, Scott C Davis, Summer L Gibbs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Theranostics · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Diagnostic Performance of Receptor-Specific Surgical Specimen Staining Correlate with Receptor Expression Level.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019
    Article
  12. Effect of staining temperature on topical dual stain imaging of tissue specimens for tumor identification.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jasmin M SchaeferOregon Health and Science University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Portland, Oregon, United States.
Connor W BarthOregon Health and Science University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Portland, Oregon, United States.
Scott C DavisThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States.
Summer L GibbsOregon Health and Science University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Portland, Oregon, United States.

Funding

Multi-probe fluorescence imaging for rapid intra-operative tumor margin assessmentR01CA188491 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI DAVIS, SCOTT C · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraoperative margin assessment is imperative to cancer cure but is a continued challenge to successful surgery. Breast conserving surgery is a relevant example, where a cosmetically improved outcome is gained over mastectomy, but re-excision is required in >25  %   of cases due to positive or closely involved margins. Clinical translation of margin assessment modalities that must directly contact the patient or required administered contrast agents are time consuming and costly to move from bench to bedside. Tumor resections provide a unique surgical opportunity to deploy margin assessment technologies including contrast agents on the resected tissues, substantially shortening the path to the clinic. However, staining of resected tissues is plagued by nonspecific uptake. A ratiometric imaging approach where matched targeted and untargeted probes are used for staining has demonstrated substantially improved biomarker quantification over staining with conventional targeted contrast agents alone. Our group has developed an antibody-based ratiometric imaging technology using fluorescently labeled, spectrally distinct targeted and untargeted antibody probes termed dual-stain difference specimen imaging (DDSI). Herein, the targeted biomarker expression level and pattern are evaluated for their effects on DDSI diagnostic potential. Epidermal growth factor receptor expression level was correlated to DDSI diagnostic potential, which was found to be robust to spatial pattern expression variation. These results highlight the utility of DDSI for accurate margin assessment of freshly resected tumor specimens.

Indexed as

Margins of ExcisionMicroscopy, FluorescenceAdipose TissueAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorBreastBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Line, TumorFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleFlow CytometryFluorescent DyesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMastectomy, SegmentalBiomarkers, TumorFluorescent Dyesbreast conserving surgerydual-stain difference specimen imagingimage-guided surgerypaired agent imaging

Identifiers

PMID30737910
PMCPMC6988447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.