Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30737886›Full record

ReviewAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2019

Cetacean Skull Telescoping Brings Evolution of Cranial Sutures into Focus.

Rachel A Roston, V Louise Roth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Meningeal Lymphatic and Glymphatic Structures in a Pelagic Delphinid (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolutionary mechanisms modulating the mammalian skull development.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Evolution and development of the cetacean skull roof: a case study in novelty and homology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The ontogeny of asymmetry in echolocating whales.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparative Anatomy of the Nasal Cavity in the Common DolphinAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  12. The Intertwined Evolution and Development of Sutures and Cranial Morphology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  13. A comparison of metrics for quantifying cranial suture complexity.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rachel A RostonDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-1958-4849
V Louise RothDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Training Program in Developmental & Stem Cell BiologyT32HD040372 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Terry H Lechler · 2001 to 2026
$8.9M
Duke University's Arts & Sciences Council on Faculty ResearchNICHD NIH HHS T32 HD040372Stephen A. Wainwright Endowment Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many modifications to the mammalian bauplan associated with the obligate aquatic lives of cetaceans-fusiform bodies, flukes, flippers, and blowholes-are evident at a glance. But among the most strikingly unusual and divergent features of modern cetacean anatomy are the arrangements of their cranial bones: (1) bones that are situated at opposite ends of the skull in other mammals are positioned close together, their proximity resulting from (2) these bones extensively overlapping the bones that ordinarily would separate them. The term "telescoping" is commonly used to describe the odd anatomy of modern cetacean skulls, yet its usage and the particular skull features to which it refers vary widely. Placing the term in historical and biological context, this review offers an explicit definition of telescoping that includes the two criteria enumerated above. Defining telescoping in this way draws attention to many specific biological questions that are raised by the unusual anatomy of cetacean skulls; highlights the central role of sutures as the locus for changes in the sizes, shapes, mechanical properties, and connectivity of cranial bones; and emphasizes the importance of sutures in skull development and evolution. The unusual arrangements of cranial bones and sutures referred to as telescoping are not easily explained by what is known about cranial development in more conventional mammals. Discovering the evolutionary-developmental processes that produce the extensive overlap characteristic of cetacean telescoping will give insights into both cetacean evolution and the "rules" that more generally govern mammalian skull function, development, and evolution. Anat Rec, 302:1055-1073, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsCetaceaCranial SuturesCetaceacranial suturesevo-devoskulltelescoping

Identifiers

PMID30737886
PMCPMC9324554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.