ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2019
Radiation Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery in Women 70 Years of Age and Older: How Wisely Do We Choose?
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Validation of a breast cancer assay for radiotherapy omission: an individual participant data meta-analysis.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of adjuvant therapies in older patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world data.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Pooled it
- Frequency of use and characterization of frailty assessments in observational studies on older women with breast cancer: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy May Serve as an Indicator for Omitting Post-Breast-Conserving Surgery Radiation Therapy in Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.Cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Analysis of low-benefit subgroups in breast-conserving surgery: Implications for clinical decision-making (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Review
- Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Low-Risk Breast Cancer in Patients ≥ 70 Years: How Wisely are We Choosing?Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- De-Escalation of Treatment in Women Aged ≥80 Years with Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis from Two Breast Centers.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- 21-gene recurrence score predictive of the benefit of postoperative radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for elderly patients with T1N0 and luminal breast cancer.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Article
- Regional Variation in Deescalated Therapy in Older Adults With Early-Stage Breast Cancer.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Association between adjuvant radiation treatment and breast cancer-specific mortality among older women with comorbidity burden: A comparative effectiveness analysis of SEER-MHOS.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Recent Advances in Optimizing Radiation Therapy Decisions in Early Invasive Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2023Review
- Trends in surgical treatment of early-stage breast cancer reveal decreasing mastectomy use between 2003 and 2016 by age, race, and rurality.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
- Surgical Axillary Staging Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Who Gets It and Why We Should Avoid It.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Patients Older 65 Years With Early Breast Cancer Prefer Intraoperative Radiation as a Locoregional Treatment Choice.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Outcomes After Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Radiotherapy in Older Women With Early-Stage, Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Effects of Radiation Therapy and Comorbidity on Health-Related Quality of Life and Mortality Among Older Women With Low-Risk Breast Cancer: Protocol for a Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR research protocols · 2020Article
- Does persistent use of radiation in women > 70 years of age with early-stage breast cancer reflect tailored patient-centered care?Breast cancer research and treatment · 2020Article
- Nodal positivity decreases with age in women with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.Cancer · 2020Article
- Older breast cancer undertreatment: unconscious bias to undertreat-potential role for the international geriatric radiotherapy group?Translational cancer research · 2020Review
- The Effect of Surgeon Referral and a Radiation Oncologist Productivity-Based Metric on Radiation Therapy Receipt Among Elderly Women With Early Stage Breast Cancer: Analysis From a Tertiary Cancer Network.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite data from randomized trials supporting omission of radiation therapy (RT) for women ≥ 70 years of age with T1, estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumors undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT), RT usage remains high. We reviewed our institutional experience to determine if risk factors for local recurrence or comorbidities influenced use.
methodsWomen ≥ 70 years of age with T1, ER+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) tumors undergoing BCT in 2010-2012 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Ten-year estimated mortality was calculated using the Suemoto index. The associations of clinicopathological features and mortality risk on receipt of RT were examined.
resultsOverall, 323 patients with 327 cancers were identified. Median age was 75 years, median tumor size was 1 cm, and all were clinically node negative; 53.7% of patients received RT. RT usage decreased with age (73.6%, age 70-74 years; 49.5%, age 75-79 years; 33.3%, age 80-84 years; 10.7%, ≥ 85 years; p < 0.001). Within age groups, estimated mortality did not impact RT usage. On multivariable analysis, only younger age and larger tumor size were associated with RT use. Recurrence-free survival was 98% versus 93% with and without RT, respectively (p = 0.011). Those who received adjuvant radiation also had improved overall survival (92% vs. 89%), although this effect did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.051).
conclusionNeither the factors associated with risk of local recurrence nor the estimated risk of death in 10 years were associated with use of adjuvant radiation in a large cohort of women ≥ 70 years of age with small ER+ breast cancers treated with breast-conserving surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.