Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30737640›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2020

Development of FamilyTalk: an Intervention to Support Communication and Educate Families About Colorectal Cancer Risk.

Deborah J Bowen, Travis Hyams, Mercy Laurino, Timothy Woolley, Stacey Cohen, Kathleen A Leppig, Gail Jarvik

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Deborah J BowenDepartment of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Box 357120, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. dbowen@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2420-4422
Travis HyamsDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Mercy LaurinoGenetics and Cancer Prevention Programs, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA.
Timothy WoolleyIEQ technologies, Inc, Springfield, OR, USA.
Stacey CohenDivision of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kathleen A LeppigGenetic Services, Kaiser Permanente of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Gail JarvikDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USKaiser Permanente · USSeattle Cancer Care Alliance · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Variation, Function, and Disease Supplement ProgramU01HG008657 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI David Russell Crosslin, Gail Pairitz Jarvik · 2015 to 2026
$13.4M
Pacific Northwest Undiagnosed Diseases Network Clinical SiteU01HG010233 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DIPPLE, KATRINA M, JARVIK, GAIL PAIRITZ · 2018 to 2022
$5.4M
Communication Intervention with Melanoma FamiliesR01CA107430 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BOWEN, DEBORAH J. · 2004 to 2007
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS P50 HG 3374NCI NIH HHS R01 CA107430NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008657NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG010233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IFamily members of individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) may be at increased risk of developing the disease. However, the majority of CRC can be prevented through colonoscopy screening and family members may not be aware if they are recommended to pursue earlier screening because of their family history of CRC. As such, tools must be developed to effectively communicate potential changes to the recommended age for colonoscopy screening and other important CRC-related information to family members. We modified and adapted a successful intervention for families with melanoma to be appropriate for families with CRC to increase communication and screening in family members. The multistep process included the following: (1) developing a paper version of the intervention, (2) piloting the paper version among families with CRC, (3) developing the web-based version, and (4) testing the intervention for usability. Qualitative data was collected and analyzed for pilot testing. Usability testing utilized both qualitative and quantitative data. Patients with CRC liked the paper version and had multiple suggestions, including adding a better introduction, sections on genetics and family history, and clearer communication assistance. The web-based tool was well received and improved upon the linear book format with links, better section instructions, and more proactive communication tools for families. These processes produced materials that satisfied individuals from various families with assistance and support for communicating about CRC. Evaluating the effects of the tools in rigorous research projects is the next step.

Indexed as

CommunicationColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFamilyHealth EducationHumansRisk FactorsColorectal cancerCommunicationFamily

Identifiers

PMID30737640
PMCPMC6688969
OpenAlexW2914480838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.