ArticleEuropean radiology2019
Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study.
Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of organ dose from chest radiography with varying beam quality and constant exposure index.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- An evaluation of the effect of tube potential on clinical image quality using direct digital detectors for pelvis and lumbar spine radiographs.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2020Article
- Dose reduction and image quality improvement of chest radiography by using bone-suppression technique and low tube voltage: a phantom study.European radiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector (FPD) system by semi-quantitatively assessment using a realistic lung phantom. MATERIALS AND
methodsChest FPD radiographs were obtained on a realistic lung phantom with simulated lung opacities using various X-ray tube voltage levels (90-140 kV) with/without copper filter. Entrance skin dose was set to maintain identical for all images (0.1 mGy). Three chest radiologists unaware of the exposure settings independently evaluated the image quality of each simulated opacity and normal structure using a 5-point scale (+ 2: clearly superior to the standard; + 1: slightly superior to the standard; 0: equal to the standard; - 1: slightly inferior to the standard; - 2: clearly inferior to the standard). The traditional FPD image obtained at a tube voltage of 120 kV was used as the standard. The scores of image quality were statistically compared using the Wilcoxon rank test with Bonferroni correction.
resultsFPD images using 90-kV shot with copper filter were superior to the traditional 120-kV shot without filter with respect to the visibility of vertebra, pulmonary vessels, and nodules overlapping diaphragm and heart (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference with respect to the visibility of all other simulated lung opacities (lung nodules except for overlying diaphragm/heart and honeycomb opacity) between each tube voltage level with/without copper filter and the traditional 120-kV shot without filter.
conclusionImage quality of FPD images using 90 kV with copper filtration is superior to that using standard tube voltage when dose is identical. KEY POINTS: • FPD image quality using 90 kV with filter is superior to that using traditional beam. • Ninety-kilovolt shot with copper filter may be suitable for chest FPD image. • Clinical study dealing with chest FPD beam optimization would be warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.