Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30737558›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2019

Low radon exposures and lung cancer risk: joint analysis of the Czech, French, and Beaverlodge cohorts of uranium miners.

Rachel S D Lane, Ladislav Tomášek, Lydia B Zablotska, Estelle Rage, Franco Momoli, Julian Little

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. PUMA - pooled uranium miners analysis: cohort profile.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2020
    Article
  9. Health Effects of Radon Exposure.Yonsei medical journal · 2019
    Review
  10. Environmental and occupational determinants of lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2019
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel S D LaneSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Room 101, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, ON, K1G 5Z3, Canada. rachel.lane@canada.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2830-2644
Ladislav TomášekNational Radiation Protection Institute (SURO), Bartoskova 28, 140 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lydia B ZablotskaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Estelle RageInstitute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, B.P. 17, 92262, Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France.
Franco MomoliSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Room 101, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, ON, K1G 5Z3, Canada.
Julian LittleSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Room 101, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, ON, K1G 5Z3, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well established that high radon exposures increase the risk of lung cancer mortality. The effects of low occupational exposures and the factors that confound and modify this risk are not clear and are needed to inform current radiation protection of miners. The risk of lung cancer mortality at low radon exposures (< 100 working-level months) was assessed in the joint cohort analysis of Czech, French, and Canadian uranium miners, employed in 1953 or later. Statistical analysis was based on linear Poisson regression modeling with grouped cohort survival data. Two sensitivity analyses were used to assess potential confounding from tobacco smoking. A statistically significant linear relationship between radon exposure and lung cancer mortality was found. The excess relative risk per working-level month was 0.022 (95% confidence intervals: 0.013-0.034), based on 408 lung cancer deaths and 394,236 person-years of risk. Time since exposure was a statistically significant modifier; risk decreased with increasing time since exposure. A tendency for a decrease in risk with increasing attained age was observed, but this was not statistically significant. Exposure rate was not found to be a modifier of the excess relative risk. The potential confounding effect of tobacco smoking was estimated to be small and did not substantially change the radon-lung cancer mortality risk estimates. This joint cohort analysis provides strong evidence for an increased risk of lung cancer mortality from low occupational radon exposures. The results suggest that radiation protection measures continue to be important among current uranium miners.

Indexed as

MinersUraniumAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaCohort StudiesCzech RepublicFranceHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureRadonRadonUraniumCohortEpidemiologyLung cancerRadonRiskSmokingUranium mining

Identifiers

PMID30737558
PMCPMC6556158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.