Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30737491›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2019

Design, execution, and analysis of CRISPR-Cas9-based deletions and genetic interaction networks in the fungal pathogen Candida albicans.

Viola Halder, Caroline B M Porter, Alejandro Chavez, Rebecca S Shapiro

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The unique Efg1 fungal virulence regulon in the catheterized bladder environment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. EditingBiomolecules · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The putative error prone polymerasenpj antimicrobials and resistance · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. CRISPR-Based Genetic Manipulation ofFrontiers in genome editing · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Viola HalderDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Caroline B M PorterKlarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Alejandro ChavezDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5626-7140
Rebecca S ShapiroDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada. shapiror@uoguelph.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7119-8865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of fungal pathogens is of immediate importance, yet progress is hindered by the technical challenges of genetic manipulation. For Candida species, their inability to maintain plasmids, unusual codon usage, and inefficient homologous recombination are among the obstacles limiting efficient genetic manipulation. New advances in genomic biotechnologies-particularly CRISPR-based tools-have revolutionized genome editing for many fungal species. Here, we present a protocol for CRISPR-Cas9-based manipulation in Candida albicans using a modified gene-drive-based strategy that takes ~1 month to complete. We detail the generation of Candida-optimized Cas9-based plasmids for gene deletion, an efficient transformation protocol using C. albicans haploids, and an optimized mating strategy to generate homozygous single- and double-gene diploid mutants. We further describe protocols for quantifying cell growth and analysis pipelines to calculate fitness and genetic interaction scores for genetic mutants. This protocol overcomes previous limitations associated with genetic manipulation in C. albicans and advances researchers' ability to perform genetic analysis in this pathogen; the protocol also has broad applicability to other mating-competent microorganisms.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticGene DeletionGenetic TechniquesCandida albicansCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Cas SystemsDiploidyHaploidyHomozygotePlasmidsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsTransformation, GeneticCRISPR-Associated Protein 9RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.