Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30737485›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2019

Prognostic restaging at the time of second-line therapy in patients with AL amyloidosis.

Yi L Hwa, Morie A Gertz, Shaji K Kumar, Martha Q Lacy, Francis K Buadi, David Dingli, Prashant Kapoor, Steve R Zeldenrust, Nelson Leung, Susanne R Hayman and 11 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Light Chain Amyloidosis: Epidemiology, Staging, and Prognostication.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yi L HwaDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Morie A GertzDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Shaji K KumarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5392-9284
Martha Q LacyDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Francis K BuadiDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
David DingliDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Prashant KapoorDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Steve R ZeldenrustDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Nelson LeungDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5651-1411
Susanne R HaymanDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Wilson I GonsalvesDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Taxiarchis V KourelisDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Rahma WarsameDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ronald S GoDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8284-3495
Eli MuchtarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2210-2174
Miriam A HobbsDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Amie L FonderDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Stephen RussellDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Robert A KyleDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
S Vincent RajkumarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Angela DispenzieriDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Dispenzieri.angela@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well known that staging of patients with AL amyloidosis at diagnosis predicts for survival, but there is a paucity of literature delineating the prognostic value of these systems at relapse. We evaluated the prognostic value of AL staging among 413 patients initiated with second-line therapy between 2000 and 2015. Both the Revised Mayo 2012 and the European revision of Mayo 2004 staging systems were used. The median time from initial treatment to second-line therapy was 11.7 months. The first-line therapy was autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in 179 (43%) patients and non-ASCT therapies in 234 patients. Median survival from the institution of second-line therapy was 61 months. Both the Mayo 2004 and 2012 staging systems were of prognostic benefit at second-line therapy with respective risk ratios of 2.78 (95% CI: 2.15, 3.58) and 3.03 (95% CI: 2.33, 3.93) for patients with > stage 2 disease. On multivariate analysis, the predictive value of staging at second-line therapy was independent of stage at diagnosis and prior ASCT as first-line therapy. This study indicates that the Mayo staging systems work well at second-line therapy. Consequently, it is suitable for the stratification of patients in trials for relapsed, refractory AL amyloidosis.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin Light-chain AmyloidosisKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetreatmentRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30737485
OpenAlexW2913895687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.