Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30737452›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord2019

Accuracy of the Actigraph wGT3x-BT for step counting during inpatient spinal cord rehabilitation.

Erin Albaum, Emily Quinn, Saba Sedaghatkish, Parminder Singh, Amber Watkins, Kristin Musselman, Josh Williams

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Combining Accelerometer and GPS Features to Evaluate Community Mobility in Knee Ankle Foot Orthoses (KAFO) Users.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erin AlbaumDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Emily QuinnDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Saba SedaghatkishDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Parminder SinghDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Amber WatkinsDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kristin MusselmanDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8336-8211
Josh WilliamsDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. josh.williams@utoronto.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designCross-sectional.

objectives(1) Assess the accuracy of the Actigraph wGT3x-BT accelerometer to count steps taken by inpatients with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) in physical therapy (PT) sessions and self-directed activities, and (2) compare the number of steps/min taken in PT sessions to that in self-directed activities during inpatient rehabilitation.

settingInpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

methodsSeventeen individuals with subacute motor iSCI were observed for up to 45-min of both PT and self-directed activities, during which steps were simultaneously tracked by the Actigraph wGT3x-BT and a researcher using a hand tally counter. Accuracy was evaluated with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the entire PT session and self-directed activities, as well as for periods of walking.

resultsThere was excellent agreement between the Actigraph wGT3x-BT and manually counted steps for entire PT sessions (ICC = 0.86) and walking periods (PT walking, ICC = 0.99; self-directed walking, ICC = 0.99). There was poor agreement for entire self-directed sessions (ICC = 0.15). Visual analysis of Bland-Altman plots supported these findings. Participants took more steps/min in PT sessions compared to self-directed activities (p = 0.023).

conclusionThe Actigraph wGT3x-BT accurately counts steps during PT sessions and walking periods in individuals with subacute motor iSCI. Clinically, this may enable physical therapists to track walking repetitions during inpatient rehabilitation more effortlessly.

Indexed as

ActigraphyAdultAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesExercise TherapyFemaleGuinea PigsHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedSpinal Cord Injuries

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.