Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30737425›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Re-evaluation of transcription factor function in tomato fruit development and ripening with CRISPR/Cas9-mutagenesis.

Rufang Wang, Eveline Carla da Rocha Tavano, Michiel Lammers, Adriana Pinheiro Martinelli, Gerco C Angenent, Ruud A de Maagd

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 191 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Dual benefits ofHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Horticulture research · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. SlPLT6 controls ripening initiation and quality traits through modulation of histone acetylation and methylation in tomato.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Two transcription factors play critical roles in mediating epigenetic regulation of fruit ripening in tomato.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. An advanced 10K SNP panel for genotyping tomato (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rufang WangLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7285-0878
Eveline Carla da Rocha TavanoCENA, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5385-3267
Michiel LammersBioscience, Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Adriana Pinheiro MartinelliCENA, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Gerco C AngenentLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ruud A de MaagdBioscience, Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. ruud.demaagd@wur.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-7049-2029
Wageningen University & Research · NLUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is a model for climacteric fleshy fruit ripening studies. Tomato ripening is regulated by multiple transcription factors together with the plant hormone ethylene and their downstream effector genes. Transcription Factors APETALA2a (AP2a), NON-RIPENING (NOR) and FRUITFULL (FUL1/TDR4 and FUL2/MBP7) were reported as master regulators controlling tomato fruit ripening. Their proposed functions were derived from studies of the phenotype of spontaneous mutants or RNAi knock-down lines rather than, as it appears now, actual null mutants. To study TF function in tomato fruit ripening in more detail, we used CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis to knock out the encoding genes, and phenotypes of these mutants are reported for the first time. While the earlier ripening, orange-ripe phenotype of ap2a mutants was confirmed, the nor null mutant exhibited a much milder phenotype than the spontaneous nor mutant. Additional analyses revealed that the severe phenotype in the spontaneous mutant is caused by a dominant-negative allele. Our approach also provides new insight into the independent and overlapping functions of FUL1 and FUL2. Single and combined null alleles of FUL1 and FUL2 illustrate that these two genes have partially redundant functions in fruit ripening, but also unveil an additional role for FUL2 in early fruit development.

Indexed as

MutagenesisCRISPR-Cas SystemsFruitGene Expression Regulation, PlantPhenotypePlant ProteinsSolanum lycopersicumTranscription FactorsPlant ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID30737425
PMCPMC6368595
OpenAlexW2913973081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.