Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30737405›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

A network of chaperones prevents and detects failures in membrane protein lipid bilayer integration.

João P L Coelho, Matthias Stahl, Nicolas Bloemeke, Kevin Meighen-Berger, Carlos Piedrafita Alvira, Zai-Rong Zhang, Stephan A Sieber, Matthias J Feige

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. SARS-CoV-2 membrane protein biogenesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. EMC chaperone-CaNature · 2023
    Article
  12. The Biogenesis of Multipass Membrane Proteins.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The mechanisms of integral membrane protein biogenesis.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

João P L CoelhoCenter for Integrated Protein Science at the Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstr. 4, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Matthias StahlCenter for Integrated Protein Science at the Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstr. 4, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Nicolas BloemekeCenter for Integrated Protein Science at the Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstr. 4, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Kevin Meighen-BergerCenter for Integrated Protein Science at the Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstr. 4, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Carlos Piedrafita AlviraCenter for Integrated Protein Science at the Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstr. 4, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Zai-Rong ZhangInterdisciplinary Research Center on Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201210, China.
Stephan A SieberCenter for Integrated Protein Science at the Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstr. 4, 85748, Garching, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9400-906X
Matthias J FeigeCenter for Integrated Protein Science at the Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstr. 4, 85748, Garching, Germany. matthias.feige@tum.de.
Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich · DEChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental step in membrane protein biogenesis is their integration into the lipid bilayer with a defined orientation of each transmembrane segment. Despite this, it remains unclear how cells detect and handle failures in this process. Here we show that single point mutations in the membrane protein connexin 32 (Cx32), which cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, can cause failures in membrane integration. This leads to Cx32 transport defects and rapid degradation. Our data show that multiple chaperones detect and remedy this aberrant behavior: the ER-membrane complex (EMC) aids in membrane integration of low-hydrophobicity transmembrane segments. If they fail to integrate, these are recognized by the ER-lumenal chaperone BiP. Ultimately, the E3 ligase gp78 ubiquitinates Cx32 proteins, targeting them for degradation. Thus, cells use a coordinated system of chaperones for the complex task of membrane protein biogenesis, which can be compromised by single point mutations, causing human disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsCharcot-Marie-Tooth DiseaseChlorocebus aethiopsConnexinsCOS CellsEndoplasmic ReticulumEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPGap Junction beta-1 ProteinGap JunctionsHeat-Shock ProteinsHEK293 CellsHumansLipid BilayersMembrane ProteinsMolecular ChaperonesMutationConnexinsEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPGap Junction beta-1 ProteinHeat-Shock ProteinsLipid BilayersMembrane ProteinsMolecular Chaperones

Identifiers

PMID30737405
PMCPMC6368539
OpenAlexW2912308279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.