Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30737015›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry2019

Model-Free and Model-Based Influences in Addiction-Related Behaviors.

Stephanie M Groman, Bart Massi, Samuel R Mathias, Daeyeol Lee, Jane R Taylor

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. From Computation to Clinic.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Reward-Mediated, Model-Free Reinforcement-Learning Mechanisms in Pavlovian and Instrumental Tasks Are Related.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie M GromanDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: stephanie.groman@yale.edu.
Bart MassiDepartment of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Samuel R MathiasDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Daeyeol LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jane R TaylorDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: jane.taylor@yale.edu.
Yale University · US

Funding

Individual differences & cocaine effects on impulsive choice in rats: D3/5HT1B R01DA043443 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Jane R Taylor · 2016 to 2026
$4.6M
Decision-Making Dysfunction and Chronic CocaineR01DA041480 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, JANE R · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA041480NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA043443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisruptions in the decision-making processes that guide action selection are a core feature of many psychiatric disorders, including addiction. Decision making is influenced by the goal-directed and habitual systems that can be computationally characterized using model-based and model-free reinforcement learning algorithms, respectively. Recent evidence suggests an imbalance in the influence of these reinforcement learning systems on behavior in individuals with substance dependence, but it is unknown whether these disruptions are a manifestation of chronic drug use and/or are a preexisting risk factor for addiction.

methodsWe trained adult male rats on a multistage decision-making task to quantify model-free and model-based processes before and after self-administration of methamphetamine or saline.

resultsIndividual differences in model-free, but not model-based, learning prior to any drug use predicted subsequent methamphetamine self-administration; rats with lower model-free behavior took more methamphetamine than rats with higher model-free behavior. This relationship was selective to model-free updating following a rewarded, but not unrewarded, choice. Both model-free and model-based learning were reduced in rats following methamphetamine self-administration, which was due to a decrement in the ability of rats to use unrewarded outcomes appropriately. Moreover, the magnitude of drug-induced disruptions in model-free learning was not correlated with disruptions in model-based behavior, indicating that drug self-administration independently altered both reinforcement learning strategies.

conclusionsThese findings provide direct evidence that model-free and model-based learning mechanisms are involved in select aspects of addiction vulnerability and pathology, and they provide a unique behavioral platform for conducting systems-level analyses of decision making in preclinical models of mental illness.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalAnimalsBehavior, AddictiveDecision MakingMaleMethamphetamineRatsReinforcement, PsychologyMethamphetamineComputational psychiatryDopamineDrug addictionMethamphetamineModel-based reinforcement learningModel-free reinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID30737015
PMCPMC6534429
OpenAlexW2907597016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.