Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2019
The early identification of disease progression in patients with suspected infection presenting to the emergency department: a multi-centre derivation and validation study.
Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03992794 (ADAPTED), which is not on this map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ADAPTED: Assessment of Disease Severity, Progression and Treatment in Infected Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- National Early Warning Score Does Not Accurately Predict Mortality for Patients With Infection Outside the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Prognostic value and organ-specific correlations of admission MR-proADM in critically ill patients: a retrospective exploratory study.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Article
- Multimarker Approach: An Effective Tool in the Risk Stratification of Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025Observational
- SEPSIGN: early identification of sepsis signs in emergency department.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Observational
- Bio-Adrenomedullin and Dipeptidyl Peptidase 3 as Novel Sepsis Biomarkers in the Emergency Department and the Intensive Care Unit: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Marker in Acute Heart Failure and Sepsis: A Comparative Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploration of the Clinical Parameters as Predictive Biomarkers and Their Potential Roles in the Regulation of Inflammation in Elderly Septic Patients with Pneumonia.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- [Utility of the medial region of pro-adrenomodulin for the detection of true bacteremia in elderly patients treated in the emergency department for suspected infection].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024Observational
- An unexpected case of thoracic necrotising fasciitis.BMJ case reports · 2024Article
- Investigating the relationship between the immune response and the severity of COVID-19: a large-cohort retrospective study.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Observational
- The Clinical Utility of Albumin with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) in Improving 30-Day Mortality Prediction in Patients with Infection in the Emergency Department.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Critical and non-critical coronavirus disease 2019 patients: which is the most predictive biomarker for disease severity and outcome?: A multicentre prospective cohort study comparing mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin, inflammatory and immunological patterns.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2023Article
- Correlation between Chest Computed Tomography Score and Laboratory Biomarkers in the Risk Stratification of COVID-19 Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- MR-proADM as Prognostic Factor of Outcome in COVID-19 Patients.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Identifying Predictors Associated with Risk of Death or Admission to Intensive Care Unit in Internal Medicine Patients with Sepsis: A Comparison of Statistical Models and Machine Learning Algorithms.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The utility of the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) compared with three other early warning scores in predicting in-hospital mortality among COVID-19 patients in the emergency department: a multicenter validation study.BMC emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Association of physiological stress markers at the emergency department to readmission and death within 90 days: a prospective observational study.Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2023Observational
- Potential Role and Prognostic Value of Interleukin-15 for Mortality Among Elderly Patients with Sepsis.Journal of inflammation research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a lack of validated tools to assess potential disease progression and hospitalisation decisions in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a suspected infection. This study aimed to identify suitable blood biomarkers (MR-proADM, PCT, lactate and CRP) or clinical scores (SIRS, SOFA, qSOFA, NEWS and CRB-65) to fulfil this unmet clinical need.
methodsAn observational derivation patient cohort validated by an independent secondary analysis across nine EDs. Logistic and Cox regression, area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess performance. Disease progression was identified using a composite endpoint of 28-day mortality, ICU admission and hospitalisation > 10 days.
resultsOne thousand one hundred seventy-five derivation and 896 validation patients were analysed with respective 28-day mortality rates of 7.1% and 5.0%, and hospitalisation rates of 77.9% and 76.2%. MR-proADM showed greatest accuracy in predicting 28-day mortality and hospitalisation requirement across both cohorts. Patient subgroups with high MR-proADM concentrations (≥ 1.54 nmol/L) and low biomarker (PCT < 0.25 ng/mL, lactate < 2.0 mmol/L or CRP < 67 mg/L) or clinical score (SOFA < 2 points, qSOFA < 2 points, NEWS < 4 points or CRB-65 < 2 points) values were characterised by a significantly longer length of hospitalisation (p < 0.001), rate of ICU admission (p < 0.001), elevated mortality risk (e.g. SOFA, qSOFA and NEWS HR [95%CI], 45.5 [10.0-207.6], 23.4 [11.1-49.3] and 32.6 [9.4-113.6], respectively) and a greater number of disease progression events (p < 0.001), compared to similar subgroups with low MR-proADM concentrations (< 1.54 nmol/L). Increased out-patient treatment across both cohorts could be facilitated using a derivation-derived MR-proADM cut-off of < 0.87 nmol/L (15.0% and 16.6%), with decreased readmission rates and no mortalities.
conclusionsIn patients presenting to the ED with a suspected infection, the blood biomarker MR-proADM could most accurately identify the likelihood of further disease progression. Incorporation into an early sepsis management protocol may therefore aid rapid decision-making in order to either initiate, escalate or intensify early treatment strategies, or identify patients suitable for safe out-patient treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.