Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30736861›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2019

Regulatory strategies for rare diseases under current global regulatory statutes: a discussion with stakeholders.

Andrew E Mulberg, Christina Bucci-Rechtweg, Joseph Giuliano, David Jacoby, Franklin K Johnson, Qing Liu, Deborah Marsden, Scott McGoohan, Robert Nelson, Nita Patel and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Economic burden of Sanfilippo syndrome in the United States.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Anesthesia outcomes in lysosomal disorders: CLN3 and GM1 gangliosidosis.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2023
    Article
  14. Literature Review on Health Emigration in Rare Diseases-A Machine Learning Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew E MulbergAmicus Therapeutics, Inc., 1 Cedar Brook Drive, Cranbury, NJ, 08512, USA. amulberg@amicusrx.com.
Christina Bucci-RechtwegNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, One Health Plaza, East Hanover, NJ, 07936, USA.
Joseph GiulianoAmicus Therapeutics, Inc., 1 Cedar Brook Drive, Cranbury, NJ, 08512, USA.
David JacobyBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., 770 Lindaro St, San Rafael, CA, 94901, USA.
Franklin K JohnsonAmicus Therapeutics, Inc., 1 Cedar Brook Drive, Cranbury, NJ, 08512, USA.
Qing LiuAmicus Therapeutics, Inc., 1 Cedar Brook Drive, Cranbury, NJ, 08512, USA.
Deborah MarsdenUltragenyx Pharmaceutical, Inc., 60 Leveroni Ct, Novato, CA, 94949, USA.
Scott McGoohanVertex Pharmaceuticals, 50 Northern Ave, Boston, MA, 02210, USA.
Robert NelsonJohnson & Johnson, 920 Route 202 South, Raritan, NJ, 08869, USA.
Nita PatelAmicus Therapeutics, Inc., 1 Cedar Brook Drive, Cranbury, NJ, 08512, USA.
Klaus RomeroCritical Path Institute, 1730 East River Rd, Tucson, AZ, 85718, USA.
Vikram SinhaMerck & Co, Inc. 351 North Sumneytown Pike, North Wales, PA, 19454, USA.
Sheela SitaramanAmicus Therapeutics, Inc., 1 Cedar Brook Drive, Cranbury, NJ, 08512, USA.
John SpaltroAmicus Therapeutics, Inc., 1 Cedar Brook Drive, Cranbury, NJ, 08512, USA.
Vivian KesslerAmicus Therapeutics, Inc., 1 Cedar Brook Drive, Cranbury, NJ, 08512, USA.
Amicus Therapeutics (United States) · USBioMarin (United States) · USCritical Path Institute · USJohnson & Johnson (United States) · USMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USUltragenyx Pharmaceutical (United States) · USVertex Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

Amicus Therapeutics, Inc NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rare or orphan diseases often are inherited and overwhelmingly affect children. Many of these diseases have no treatments, are incurable, and have a devastating impact on patients and their families. Regulatory standards for drug approval for rare diseases must ensure that patients receive safe and efficacious treatments. However, regulatory bodies have shown flexibility in applying these standards to drug development in rare diseases, given the unique challenges that hinder efficient and effective traditional clinical trials, including low patient numbers, limited understanding of disease pathology and progression, variability in disease presentation, and a lack of established endpoints.To take steps toward improving rare disease clinical development strategies under current global regulatory statutes, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. and BioNJ convened a 1-day meeting that included representatives from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), biopharmaceutical industry, and not-for-profit agencies. The meeting focused on orphan diseases in pediatric and adult patients and was intended to identify potential strategies to overcome regulatory hurdles through open collaboration.During this meeting, several strategies were identified to minimize the limitations associated with low patient numbers in rare diseases, including the use of natural history to generate historical control data in comparisons, simulations, and identifying inclusion/exclusion criteria and appropriate endpoints. Novel approaches to clinical trial design were discussed to minimize patient exposure to placebo and to reduce the numbers of patients and clinical trials needed for providing substantial evidence. Novel statistical analysis approaches were also discussed to address the inherent challenges of small patient numbers. Areas of urgent unmet need were identified, including the need to develop registries that protect patient identities, to establish close collaboration and communication between the sponsor and regulatory bodies to address methodological and statistical challenges, to collaborate in pre-competitive opportunities within multiple sponsors and in conjunction with academia and disease-specific patient advocacy groups for optimal data sharing, and to develop harmonized guidelines for data extrapolation from source to target pediatric populations. Ultimately, these innovations will help in solving many regulatory challenges in rare disease drug development and encourage the availability of new treatments for patients with rare diseases.

Indexed as

Rare DiseasesDrug ApprovalHumansUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID30736861
PMCPMC6368795
OpenAlexW2917235576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.