ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2019
Regulatory strategies for rare diseases under current global regulatory statutes: a discussion with stakeholders.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of N-Acetyl-l-Leucine in Children and Adults With GM2 Gangliosidoses.Neurology · 2023Trial
- Statistical Guardrails for Hybrid-Controlled Trials: Robust to Confounding and Between-Study Heterogeneity.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- Health Technology Assessment Guidelines and Recommendations Across European Union Countries and the United Kingdom in Rare Disease and Paediatric Populations.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Article
- The Economics of Drug Development: A Comparison between Orphan and Non-orphan Drugs.Current drug discovery technologies · 2026Article
- Using a discrete choice experiments to explore societal preferences for valuing new drugs for rare diseases.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Economic burden of Sanfilippo syndrome in the United States.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Criteria to evaluate unmet health-related needs of persons living with rare diseases and their caregivers: rapid literature review and stakeholder consultations.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Review
- Use of Basket Trials to Solve Sleep Problems in Patients with Rare Diseases.Clocks & sleep · 2024Article
- Rare disease clinical trials in the European Union: navigating regulatory and clinical challenges.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Review
- The European landscape for gene therapies in orphan diseases: 6-year experience with the EMA Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023Article
- Generalized pairwise comparisons of prioritized outcomes are a powerful and patient-centric analysis of multi-domain scores.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Biomarkers to predict disease progression and therapeutic response in isolated methylmalonic acidemia.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2023Review
- Anesthesia outcomes in lysosomal disorders: CLN3 and GM1 gangliosidosis.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2023Article
- Literature Review on Health Emigration in Rare Diseases-A Machine Learning Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- An Idealized Clinicogenomic Registry to Engage Underrepresented Populations Using Innovative Technology.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Dose-finding studies in drug development for rare genetic diseases.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Article
- Can Innovative Trial Designs in Orphan Diseases Drive Advancement of Treatments for Common Neurological Diseases?Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2022Review
- Therapy Trial Design in Vanishing White Matter: An Expert Consortium Opinion.Neurology. Genetics · 2022Review
- Immune- and Non-Immune-Mediated Adverse Effects of Monoclonal Antibody Therapy: A Survey of 110 Approved Antibodies.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Modified Delphi procedure-based expert consensus on endpoints for an international disease registry for Metachromatic Leukodystrophy: The European Metachromatic Leukodystrophy initiative (MLDi).Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Rare or orphan diseases often are inherited and overwhelmingly affect children. Many of these diseases have no treatments, are incurable, and have a devastating impact on patients and their families. Regulatory standards for drug approval for rare diseases must ensure that patients receive safe and efficacious treatments. However, regulatory bodies have shown flexibility in applying these standards to drug development in rare diseases, given the unique challenges that hinder efficient and effective traditional clinical trials, including low patient numbers, limited understanding of disease pathology and progression, variability in disease presentation, and a lack of established endpoints.To take steps toward improving rare disease clinical development strategies under current global regulatory statutes, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. and BioNJ convened a 1-day meeting that included representatives from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), biopharmaceutical industry, and not-for-profit agencies. The meeting focused on orphan diseases in pediatric and adult patients and was intended to identify potential strategies to overcome regulatory hurdles through open collaboration.During this meeting, several strategies were identified to minimize the limitations associated with low patient numbers in rare diseases, including the use of natural history to generate historical control data in comparisons, simulations, and identifying inclusion/exclusion criteria and appropriate endpoints. Novel approaches to clinical trial design were discussed to minimize patient exposure to placebo and to reduce the numbers of patients and clinical trials needed for providing substantial evidence. Novel statistical analysis approaches were also discussed to address the inherent challenges of small patient numbers. Areas of urgent unmet need were identified, including the need to develop registries that protect patient identities, to establish close collaboration and communication between the sponsor and regulatory bodies to address methodological and statistical challenges, to collaborate in pre-competitive opportunities within multiple sponsors and in conjunction with academia and disease-specific patient advocacy groups for optimal data sharing, and to develop harmonized guidelines for data extrapolation from source to target pediatric populations. Ultimately, these innovations will help in solving many regulatory challenges in rare disease drug development and encourage the availability of new treatments for patients with rare diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.