Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30736841›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Design and implementation of a large and complex trial in emergency medical services.

Maria J Robinson, Jodi Taylor, Stephen J Brett, Jerry P Nolan, Matthew Thomas, Barnaby C Reeves, Chris A Rogers, Sarah Voss, Madeleine Clout, Jonathan R Benger and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07027813 (Feasibility and Efficacy of Ambulance-Based m-Health for Pediatric Emergencies in Low Resource Settings), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07027813 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility and Efficacy of Ambulance-Based m-Health for Pediatric Emergencies in Low Resource Settings (FEAMER) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled900ConditionsEmergencies, mHealth, Child Health, Critical IllnessArmsTelemedicine, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Maria J RobinsonSouth Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK. maria.robinson@swast.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6978-8575
Jodi TaylorClinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Stephen J BrettCentre for Perioperative Medicine and Critical Care Research, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Jerry P NolanDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
Matthew ThomasUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Barnaby C ReevesClinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Chris A RogersClinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Sarah VossFaculty of Health and Applied Sciences, Glenside Campus, University of the West of England, Bristol, BS16 1DD, UK.
Madeleine CloutClinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Jonathan R BengerUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
AIRWAYS-2 study team
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of the West of England · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBRoyal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust · GBSouth Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health HTA/12/167/102Health Technology Assessment Programme 12/167/102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe research study titled "Cluster randomised trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of the i-gel supraglottic airway device versus tracheal intubation in the initial airway management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (AIRWAYS-2)" is a large-scale study being run in the English emergency medical (ambulance) services (EMS). It compares two airway management strategies (tracheal intubation and the i-gel) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We describe the methods used to minimise bias and the challenges associated with the set-up, enrolment, and follow-up that were addressed.

methodsAIRWAYS-2 enrols adults without capacity when there is no opportunity to seek prior consent and when the intervention must be delivered immediately. We therefore adopted a cluster randomised design where the unit of randomisation is the individual EMS provider (paramedic). However, because paramedics could not be blinded to the intervention, it was necessary to automatically enrol all eligible patients in the study to avoid bias. Effective implementation required engagement with four large EMS and 95 receiving hospitals. Very high levels of data capture were required to ensure study integrity, and this necessitated collaborative working across multiple organisations. We sought to manage these processes by using a large and comprehensive electronic study database, implementing efficient trial procedures and comprehensive training.

resultsSuccessful implementation of the study design was facilitated by the approaches used. The necessary regulatory and ethical approvals to conduct the study were secured, and benefited from strong patient and public involvement. Early and continued consultation with decision makers within the four participating EMS resulted in a coordinated approach to study set-up. All receiving hospitals gave approval and agreed to collect data. A comprehensive database and programme of training and support were implemented. More than 1500 paramedics have been recruited to the study, and patient enrolment and follow-up has proceeded as planned.

conclusionCare provided by EMS needs to be based on evidence. Although participants may be experiencing life-threatening emergencies, high-quality pre-hospital research is possible in well-designed and well-managed studies. The approaches described here can be used to support successful research that will lead to improved treatment and outcomes in similar patient groups.

trial registrationISRCTN08256118 . Registered on 22 July 2014.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesEmergency Medical TechniciansAmbulancesCardiopulmonary ResuscitationCooperative BehaviorEnglandEvidence-Based Emergency MedicineHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationIntubation, IntratrachealMulticenter Studies as TopicOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStakeholder ParticipationTreatment OutcomeCardiopulmonary resuscitationEmergency medical servicesOut-of-hospital cardiac arrestResearch design

Identifiers

PMID30736841
PMCPMC6368693
OpenAlexW2921677166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.