Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30736435›Full record

ArticleCancers2019

Hereditary Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Study of 5143 Italian Families with History of BRCA-Related Malignancies.

Angela Toss, Marta Venturelli, Eleonora Molinaro, Stefania Pipitone, Elena Barbieri, Isabella Marchi, Elena Tenedini, Lucia Artuso, Sara Castellano, Marco Marino and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angela TossDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy. angela.toss@unimore.it.
Marta VenturelliDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy. martaventurelli@msn.com.
Eleonora MolinaroDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy. ele.molinaro.89@gmail.com.
Stefania PipitoneDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy. stefania.pipitone88@gmail.com.
Elena BarbieriDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy. barbieri.elena@aou.mo.it.
Isabella MarchiDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy. marchi.isabella@policlinico.mo.it.
Elena TenediniCentre for Genome Research, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy. elena.tenedini@unimore.it.
Lucia ArtusoCentre for Genome Research, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy. lucia.artuso@unimore.it.
Sara CastellanoClinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy. sara.castellano@unimore.it.
Marco MarinoClinical Genomics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124, Modena, Italy. marcomarino83@gmail.com.
Enrico TagliaficoCentre for Genome Research, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy. elena.tenedini@unimore.it.
Elisabetta RazzaboniDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy. elisabetta.razzaboni@gmail.com.
Elisabetta De MatteisDepartment of Oncology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, 73100 Lecce, Italy. marcomarino83@gmail.com.
Stefano CascinuDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy. sara.castellano@unimore.it.
Laura CortesiDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy. hbc@unimore.it.
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITOspedale Vito Fazzi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of BRCA mutations plays a crucial role in the management of hereditary cancer prevention and treatment. Nonetheless, BRCA-testing in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients is not universally introduced in clinical practice. A retrospective analysis was conducted, firstly, to evaluate the rate of BRCA-positive families among those presenting a family history of PC besides breast and/or ovarian cancer. Secondly, the relationship between BRCA pathogenic variants and PC risk was evaluated. Finally, the characteristics of PC developed in BRCA families were described. Among 5143 family trees reporting breast and/or ovarian cancer cases, 392 showed a family history of PC. A total of 35 families (24.5% selected by the Modena Criteria and 21.3% by the NCCN Criteria) were positive to BRCA testing. Among the BRCA1 mutations, 36.8% were found within a region defined by c.3239⁻c.3917, whilst 43.7% of BRCA2 mutations were located within c.7180⁻c.8248. This study confirmed that an increase in the rate of positive tests in families with PC when associated to breast and/or ovarian tumors. Moreover, this analysis indicated two possible Pancreatic Cancer Cluster Regions that should be verified in future research. Finally, PC in families with breast and/or ovarian cancer history, particularly in BRCA families, were diagnosed at younger age and showed better one-year overall survival.

Indexed as

BRCA genesgenetic testinghereditary cancerhomologous recombinationpancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID30736435
PMCPMC6406586
OpenAlexW2912649597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.