ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019
Proteomics, Holm Oak (
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Organ-Specific Profiling of Douglas Fir (Biomolecules · 2023Article
- A first draft genome of holm oak (Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Article
- Proteomics research in forest trees: A 2012-2022 update.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Multiomic Data Integration in the Analysis of Drought-Responsive Mechanisms inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Multiomics Molecular Research into the Recalcitrant and OrphanInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Identification of Proteases and Protease Inhibitors in Seeds of the Recalcitrant Forest Tree SpeciesFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Effect and Response ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Dissecting the Seed Maturation and Germination Processes in the Non-OrthodoxInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Plant Proteomic Research 2.0: Trends and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proteomics has had a big impact on plant biology, considered as a valuable tool for several forest species, such as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.