ArticleJournal of virological methods2019
Impact of long-term storage of clinical samples collected from 1996 to 2017 on RT-PCR detection of norovirus.
Article in Journal of virological methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Within-host influenza viral diversity in the pediatric population as a function of age, vaccine, and health status.Virus evolution · 2024Article
- Parasite detection and quantification in avian blood is dependent on storage medium and duration.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Genomic analysis of human noroviruses using combined Illumina-Nanopore data.Virus evolution · 2021Article
- Performance characteristics of a quantitative PCR assay on repository stool specimens and smeared filter-paper cards.BMC research notes · 2020Article
- Evaluation of the FecalSwab for Stool Specimen Storage and Molecular Detection of Enteropathogens on the BD Max System.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Noroviruses are recognized as the leading cause of acute gastroenteritis globally. With improved molecular diagnostics developed over the last two decades, archived clinical specimens are increasingly used to investigate the historic prevalence and molecular epidemiology of human norovirus. Yet the impact of long-term storage on viral integrity in clinical specimens has not been evaluated. In this study, we retested 994 stool specimens collected between 1996 and 2017 that originally tested norovirus-positive to quantify the loss of norovirus RT-PCR positivity with increasing sample storage time at 4 °C. In all, 79% of samples tested positive after retesting, but there was an approximate 3% decline in the positivity ratio and 4% decline in the percentage of samples that could be genotyped with each additional year of sample storage. For samples that were originally quantified by real-time RT-PCR (collected between 2003 and 2017), there was an estimated 1-log loss of viral titer occurring every 7 years of sample storage. Few samples contained PCR inhibitors, assessed using a MS2 extraction control, indicating that loss of RT-PCR signal was due primarily to loss of viral RNA integrity after long-term storage of stool samples at 4 °C. Our results indicate that norovirus positive stool samples can be stored with minimal loss in RT-PCR positivity when stored less than a decade. Longer periods of storage may impair norovirus detection, potentially impacting historic estimates of norovirus prevalence and molecular epidemiology if derived by testing archival clinical specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.