Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30735549›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Serological and molecular detection of Bartonella henselae in specimens from patients with suspected cat scratch disease in Italy: A comparative study.

Valeria Allizond, Cristina Costa, Francesca Sidoti, Sara Scutera, Gabriele Bianco, Rosaria Sparti, Giuliana Banche, Paola Dalmasso, Anna Maria Cuffini, Rossana Cavallo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical and epidemiological features of cat-scratch disease: a 16-year case retrospective study in a portuguese tertiary care centre.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Experimental Infection of Ferrets withPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring the Zoonotic Risk ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Man in His Forties with Recurrent Cat-Scratch Disease.Case reports in infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. ProfilingJournal of veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  18. Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  19. Limitations of Serological Diagnosis of Typical Cat Scratch Disease and Recommendations for the Diagnostic Procedure.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2023
    Review
  20. Clinical case reports · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Valeria AllizondMicrobiology section, Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Cristina CostaMicrobiology and Virology Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Francesca SidotiMicrobiology and Virology Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Sara ScuteraMicrobiology section, Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Gabriele BiancoMicrobiology and Virology Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Rosaria SpartiMicrobiology section, Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Giuliana BancheMicrobiology section, Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2219-0223
Paola DalmassoStatistics section, Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Anna Maria CuffiniMicrobiology section, Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Rossana CavalloMicrobiology and Virology Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Tiziana MussoMicrobiology section, Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cat scratch disease (CSD) is an infectious disease caused by Bartonella henselae, usually characterized by self-limiting regional lymphadenopathy and fever. Given the low clinical diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of conventional anti-B. henselae indirect immunofluorescence assays (IFAs), real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based detection of B. henselae is now being proposed as a more sensitive tool to diagnose CSD. Thus, here we have assessed the efficacy of real-time PCR in detecting B. henselae in different specimens from patients with suspected CSD and compared it to that of IFA. From March 2011 to May 2016, at the Microbiology and Virology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy, 115 clinical specimens (56 aspirated pus, 39 fresh lymph node biopsies, and 20 whole blood samples) and 99 sera from 115 patients with suspected CSD (62 females and 53 males between the ages of 3 months and 68 years) were analyzed by both real-time PCR, used in a qualitative way, and IFA (IgM and IgG) for the presence of B. henselae. For 16 patients, serological results were not available due to a clinical decision not to request the test. B. henselae DNA positivity was detected by real-time PCR in 37.39% of patients, while 62.61% of them were negative. Thus, patients were divided into two groups: real-time PCR+ (n = 43) and real-time PCR- (n = 72). Real-time PCR screening of whole blood, biopsies, and aspirated pus revealed B. henselae positivity in 40%, 38.46%, and 35.71% of patients, respectively. When we analyzed samples by IFA, we found the presence of B. henselae in 28 out of 99 (28.28%) patients, of which 11 (11.11%) belonged to the real-time PCR+ group and 17 (17.17%) to the real-time PCR- group. Among the 71 seronegative subjects, 16 (16.16%) were found positive for B. henselae by real-time PCR. Thus, by combining the results of both assays, we were able to increase the percentage of B. henselae positive specimens from 27.27% (real-time PCR) or 28.28% (IFA) to 44.44% (real-time PCR+IFA). Altogether, these findings indicate that the early detection of B. henselae in patients with suspicious CSD through combined real-time PCR and serological analyses can lead to a more accurate diagnosis of CSD, thereby allowing prompt and appropriate disease management.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, BacterialBartonella henselaeCat-Scratch DiseaseChildChild, PreschoolDNA, BacterialEarly DiagnosisFemaleFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHumansInfantItalyMaleAntibodies, BacterialDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID30735549
PMCPMC6368319
OpenAlexW2913855368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.