Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30735526›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Analysis of Anasplatyrhynchos genome resequencing data reveals genetic signatures of artificial selection.

Tieshan Xu, Lihong Gu, Haopeng Yu, Xuefei Jiang, Yunsheng Zhang, Xiaohui Zhang, Guang Rong, Zhengkui Zhou, Kyle M Schachtschneider, Shuisheng Hou

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tieshan XuTropical Crop Genetic Resource Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Danzhou, P.R. China.
Lihong GuInstitute of Animal Science & Veterinary, Hainan Academy of Agricultural Science, Haikou, P.R. China.
Haopeng YuWest China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, P.R. China.
Xuefei JiangInstitute of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou, P.R. China.
Yunsheng ZhangTropical Crop Genetic Resource Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Danzhou, P.R. China.
Xiaohui ZhangCollege of Animal Science, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang P.R. China.
Guang RongInstitute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China.
Zhengkui ZhouTropical Crop Genetic Resource Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Danzhou, P.R. China.
Kyle M SchachtschneiderDepartment of Radiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Shuisheng HouTropical Crop Genetic Resource Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Danzhou, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0001-8016-8863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three artificially selected duck populations (AS), higher lean meat ratios (LTPD), higher fat ratios (FTPD) and higher quality meat (CMD), have been developed in China, providing excellent populations for investigation of artificial selection effects. However, the genetic signatures of artificial selection are unclear. In this study, we sequenced the genome sequences of these three artificially selected populations and their ancestral population (mallard, M). We then compared the genome sequences between AS and M and between LTPD and FTPD using integrated strategies such as anchoring scaffolds to pseudo-chromosomes, mutation detection, selective screening, GO analysis, qRT-PCR, and protein multiple sequences alignment to uncover genetic signatures of selection. We anchored duck scaffolds to pseudo-chromosomes and obtained 28 pseudo-chromosomes, accounting for 84% of duck genome in length. Totally 78 and 99 genes were found to be under selection between AS and M and between LTPD and FTPD. Genes under selection between AS and M mainly involved in pigmentation and heart rates, while genes under selection between LTPD and FTPD involved in muscle development and fat deposition. A heart rate regulator (HCN1), the strongest selected gene between AS and M, harbored a GC deletion in AS and displayed higher mRNA expression level in M than in AS. IGF2R, a regulator of skeletal muscle mass, was found to be under selection between FTPD and LTPD. We also found two nonsynonymous substitutions in IGF2R, which might lead to higher IGF2R mRNA expression level in FTPD than LTPD, indicating the two nonsynonymous substitutions might play a key role for the regulation of duck skeletal muscle mass. Taken together, these results of this study provide valuable insight for the genetic basis of duck artificial selection.

Indexed as

GenomeMeatSelection, GeneticAdipose TissueAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAvian ProteinsBody CompositionBreedingChromosome MappingDucksFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGene OntologyHeart RateAvian ProteinsHyperpolarization-Activated Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated ChannelsReceptor, IGF Type 2

Identifiers

PMID30735526
PMCPMC6368380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.