Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30735506›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2019

Prevalence of TMD and level of chronic pain in a group of Brazilian adolescents.

Paulo Correia de Melo Júnior, João Marcílio Coelho Netto Lins Aroucha, Manuela Arnaud, Maria Goretti de Souza Lima, Simone Guimarães Farias Gomes, Rosana Ximenes, Aronita Rosenblatt, Arnaldo de França Caldas

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paulo Correia de Melo JúniorPostgraduate Program in Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Camaragibe, Pernambuco, Brazil.
João Marcílio Coelho Netto Lins ArouchaPostgraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Manuela ArnaudPostgraduate Program in Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Camaragibe, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Maria Goretti de Souza LimaPostgraduate Program in Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Camaragibe, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2539-2357
Simone Guimarães Farias GomesDepartment of Prosthesis and Oral Facial Surgery, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Rosana XimenesDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Aronita RosenblattDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Camaragibe, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Arnaldo de França CaldasDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Camaragibe, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3713-7532
Universidade de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo determine the prevalence of temporomandibular disorders and associated factors in an adolescent sample from Recife, Brazil. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with 1342 adolescents aged 10-17 years. The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) was used by calibrated examiners to evaluate the presence and levels of chronic pain. To evaluate the socioeconomic conditions, the subjects answered the Brazilian Economic Classification Criteria (CCEB) questionnaire. Data were analyzed by means of binary logistic regression in SPSS.

resultsThe results showed that 33.2% of the subjects had TMD irrespective of age (p = 0.153) or economic class (p = 0.653). Statistically significant associations were found between TMD and female gender (p = 0.017), headache/migraine in the past six months (p<0.001), chronic pain (p<0.001) and chronic pain level (p<0.001). In the final model, logistic regression showed that the level of chronic pain and the headache/migraine in the past six months were related to the presence of TMD.

conclusionsThe prevalence of TMD was considered high (33.2%) and adolescents with chronic pain and headache in the past six months were more likely to have TMD. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The data contribute to the understanding of TMD among adolescents and to the development of preventive measures and polices to identify the dysfunction promptly.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsBrazilChildChronic PainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHeadacheHumansMalePrevalenceSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsTemporomandibular Joint Disorders

Identifiers

PMID30735506
PMCPMC6368276
OpenAlexW2951855617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.